Trial reportOral health & preventive dentistry2025
Oral Health Effects Among Adults Switching from Cigarettes to on!® Nicotine Pouches Compared to Those Who Continue Smoking.
Trial report in Oral health & preventive dentistry, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed.
- Oral Nicotine Pouch Use and Associations with Periodontal Status and Salivary Microbiome Dysbiosis.JDR clinical and translational research · 2026Article
- Nicotine pouches: an aid in smoking cessation, or a new public health hazard?Internal and emergency medicine · 2026Review
- Nicotine pouches, oral cancer and tobacco harm reduction: current evidence and research priorities.Frontiers in oral health · 2026Review
- Self-reported oral health outcomes after switching to a novel nicotine pouch technology: a pilot study.Acta odontologica Scandinavica · 2025Observational
- Investigating oral nicotine pouch use among adults in Riyadh, Saudi Arabia: prevalence, awareness, susceptibility, and associated symptoms.Frontiers in public health · 2025Article
- Comparative evaluation of artificial saliva and complete artificial saliva as solvent vehicles forFrontiers in toxicology · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purposeThe oral-health impact of nicotine pouches, an emerging category of oral tobacco products, has not been well studied. We evaluated the effects of switching from cigarettes to on!® nicotine pouches (test product, TPs) on oral-health endpoints among adult smokers (AS) relative to those who just continued smoking (CS). MATERIALS AND
methodsIn this randomised, open-label, parallel-group study, participants were randomly assigned to ad libitum use of 2, 4, or 8 mg nicotine TP or CS for 24 weeks. Oral-health endpoints, e.g., Modified Gingival Index (MGI), Gingival Bleeding Index (BI), and Lobene Stain Index (LSI)] were assessed at baseline and weeks 12 and 24, and compared between the TP and CS groups by using linear mixed model analysis for repeated measurements.
resultsn = 155 participants were randomised; 100 (TP = 48; CS = 52) completed week 12, and 85 (TP = 40; CS = 45) completed week 24 assessments. The TP group reduced their cigarette consumption by >90% by weeks 12 and 24 despite not intending to quit at baseline. Statistically significant reductions (p < 0.001) were observed for MGI and BI at weeks 12 (MGI = 20%; BI = 30%) and 24 (MGI = 28%; BI = 23%) in the TP group compared to the CS group, as well as compared to baseline. Statistically significant reductions (~60%, p < 0.001) were also observed for LSI in TP vs CS. No statistically significant changes were observed for LSI in the CS group at weeks 12 and 24 compared to baseline. DISCUSSION: The findings from this study suggest that TPs do not negatively impact users' oral health over 24 weeks of use. The reduction in oral health endpoints supports the harm reduction potential of TPs.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.