ArticleJournal of human nutrition and dietetics : the official journal of the British Dietetic Association2025
Designing Better Resources: Consumer Experiences, Priorities and Preferences Regarding Contemporary Nutrition Education Materials.
Article in Journal of human nutrition and dietetics : the official journal of the British Dietetic Association, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Co-Developing User-Centred Nutrition Educational Resources to Integrate Nutrition Into Multiple Sclerosis Care: A Collaborative Approach With Healthcare Professionals and Healthcare Consumers.Health expectations : an international journal of public participation in health care and health policy · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
introductionNutrition education materials are frequently used by dietitians to support counselling and education. Few studies have explored consumer perspectives regarding these resources and none in a contemporary setting post pandemic.
methodsPurposive sampling was used to recruit a range of Australian consumers to participate in seven focus groups (conducted between April 2022 and May 2024). Each group involved 6-10 participants. Transcripts were inductively coded and thematic analysis was used to identify recurrent themes that best reflected consumer experiences, priorities and preferences regarding contemporary consumer nutrition education materials. Latent and manifest analysis was conducted on annotations made by consumers on consumer nutrition education materials.
resultsConsumers (n = 45) articulated four recurring themes: barriers to use (overwhelming volume of information, unclear purpose, credibility), desirable language (plain language, positive messaging), attention to content (minimal key messages, individualised and actionable materials, culturally applicable) and optimal layout and design (appealing and thoughtful visuals, signposting and flow, colour). A framework for the evaluation and development of nutrition education materials was developed based on consumer insights and relevant literature. This framework can be used to improve the quality of future education materials used to support nutrition counselling and education activities.
conclusionThe findings from this study provide dietitians with practical guidance to design nutrition education materials that meet consumer needs and expectations.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.