ArticleAustralian dental journal2025
Influence of patient demographics and socio-economic status on treatment choices for permanent mature teeth with painful vital teeth: a pilot study in the Australian public dental system.
Article in Australian dental journal, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Clinical outcomes of vital pulp therapy versus root canal treatment in immature permanent teeth with pulpal involvement: a meta-analysis.Frontiers in pediatrics · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
introductionSocio-economic status influences treatment decisions. This influence remains uncovered in teeth with painful pulpitis.
aimsTo investigate the influence of patients' demographics and socio-economic status on treatment choices for permanent mature teeth with painful vital teeth.
methodsRecords of adult patients who received extraction, root canal treatment and vital pulp therapy in public sector dental care were categorized. Correlation of patient age, gender and socio-economic status with rendered treatments was investigated. Patients' socio-economic status was determined using their postcode's Socio-Economic Indices for Areas (SEIFA) scores; a high score indicates higher status. Three groups of n = 25 patients per treatment were randomly selected after applying the inclusion criteria. Data were analysed using chi-square test, One-way ANOVA and Kruskal-Wallis test.
resultsThere was no significant correlation between patient age or gender and treatment performed (P = 0.250, P = 0.683). SEIFA scores were higher for vital pulp therapy, then root canal treatments and lowest for extraction; however, no significant association existed between patients' socio-economic status and treatment type (P = 0.210). A formal diagnosis was not documented in 8% of vital pulp therapies, 28% of root canal treatments, and 64% of extraction cases. Vital pulp therapy was never offered in root canal treatment or extraction groups. Pulp exposure guided vital pulp treatments, while patient preference drove half of root canal treatment and extraction choices.
conclusionsPatients age and gender did not affect treatment decisions. Socio-economic status might influence treatment decisions in painful permanent teeth. The service setting appears to have a major impact.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.