ReviewSleep2025
Racial disparities in obstructive sleep apnea care in the United States.
Review in Sleep, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed.
- Positional Obstructive Sleep Apnea: A Model for Precision Sleep Medicine.Journal of otorhinolaryngology, hearing and balance medicine · 2026Article
- Rethinking Long-Term Follow-Up of CPAP Therapy in Obstructive Sleep Apnea: Toward Personalized and Integrated Care.Healthcare (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Review
- Review
- Machine Learning-Based Multidimensional Oximetry for Obstructive Sleep Apnea Screening: Development and External Validation.JMIR medical informatics · 2026Article
- Racial and ethnic disparities in the management of risk factors in individuals with atrial fibrillation: A narrative review.American journal of preventive cardiology · 2026Review
- Risk factors associated with the co-occurrence of severe pain and sleep disturbance in oncology outpatients receiving chemotherapy.Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
Abstract
As with much of medicine, racial health disparities exist in the care of patients with obstructive sleep apnea (OSA). These disparities impact all aspects of care from screening and diagnosis to treatment and long-term management. Substantial barriers exist for Black and other historically marginalized racial groups in the US to obtain evaluation for OSA, exacerbated by knowledge deficits about OSA. These barriers result in disease severity being much greater at the time of clinical diagnosis. Many screening and diagnostic tools used in OSA care were adopted based on their utility in White populations without consideration of their performance in other racial groups. For example, the reduced sensitivity of pulse oximetry in detecting desaturations in people with darker skin pigmentation has been heretofore ignored in defining hypopnea. In terms of treatment, outcomes from common therapies are worse in many racial minority groups. Adherence to continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP) is substantially lower and adenotonsillectomy is less effective in resolving OSA and more likely to produce respiratory complications in Black compared to White patients. Many coverage policies further exacerbate racial disparities in OSA care. Interventions such as greater utilization of home sleep apnea testing and automated feedback messaging of CPAP use exist that can help reduce disparities. However, the development of a more diverse workforce and prioritization of health equity in developing every step of OSA care will be necessary to eliminate racial disparities ultimately.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.