ArticleKnee surgery, sports traumatology, arthroscopy : official journal of the ESSKA2025
A new preclinical sheep model of medial meniscus anterior root repair: Part 2-Surgical strategy, technical considerations, pearls and pitfalls.
Article in Knee surgery, sports traumatology, arthroscopy : official journal of the ESSKA, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Region specific microstructural complexity of the ovine meniscus root provides an organizational basis for injury susceptibility.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- A new preclinical sheep model of medial meniscus anterior root repair: Part 2-Surgical strategy, technical considerations, pearls and pitfalls.Knee surgery, sports traumatology, arthroscopy : official journal of the ESSKA · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
purposeTo address a gap in translational research by developing a preclinical sheep model of medial meniscus anterior root (MAR) repair in vivo and to compare probabilities of potential pitfalls and difficulties with humans.
methodsPreoperative planning and surgical procedures applied to patients were adapted to adult sheep. Eight healthy, skeletally mature, female Merino ewes between 2 and 4 years of age underwent a mini-open medial parapatellar approach to both stifle joints without luxating the patella. Next, the MAR was transected in 16 knees (8 sheep) resulting in a subtype 2A tear according to the LaPrade classification, followed by a transtibial pull-out repair through a 3.2 mm diameter bone tunnel with a reinforced Mason-Allen suture and non-absorbable suture material. Animals were followed until 21 days after surgery.
resultsThe surgery time per knee ranged between 30 and 50 min (mean, 40.0 ± 7.8 min). The surgical technique was safe without intra- or post-operative complications. Solid repair is most likely if the following surgical principles are respected: (1) Selection of the MAR and the open technique allow for elegant tunnel positioning and less post-operative loading stress due to the normal extension deficit of sheep; (2) careful preparation of the MAR is mandatory; (3) considering the oval shape of the MAR attachment (MARA) results in anatomic tunnel placement; (4) robust suture placement and configuration avoids suture cut out. The probabilities of potential pitfalls and difficulties differ from the human situation.
conclusionA clinically adapted MAR repair model in adult sheep was developed following its complete transection close to the MARA, followed by an open transtibial pull-out repair. The surgical technique was safe without intra- or short-term post-operative complications. This model may be suitable to study the biomechanics and pathophysiology of meniscal root injuries and their repair. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level IV.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.