ArticleEuropean journal of neurology2025
Testing for Acetylcholine Receptor and Muscle-Specific Tyrosine Kinase Antibodies by Fixed Cell-Based Assay in Clinical Practice: Positive Predictive Value for Myasthenia Gravis.
Article in European journal of neurology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Enhanced antibody detection via live cell-based assay among RIA negative myasthenia gravis patients: toward improved diagnosis and clinical correlates.Journal of neurology · 2026Article
- MuSK myasthenia gravis: from antigen-antibody to clinical translation.Frontiers in immunology · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundFixed cell-based assays (CBAs) to detect acetylcholine receptor and muscle-specific tyrosine kinase antibodies (anti-AChR/MuSK) are now available, but evaluations of their diagnostic performance in clinical practice are lacking. We examined the positive predictive value (PPV) of anti-AChR/MuSK fixed CBA for myasthenia gravis (MG), following the implementation of this assay as first-line testing at our centre.
methodsWe identified all patients at our centre with positive anti-AChR/MuSK fixed CBA results between November 2021 and July 2024. Clinical information was reviewed to classify patients as having true positive or false positive antibody results. Patients with a clinical presentation compatible with MG and no more likely alternative diagnosis were classified as true positives, whereas all others were classified as false positives. Test PPV was calculated as the proportion of positives that were classified as true positives.
resultsOf 770 patients who underwent anti-AChR/MuSK fixed CBA testing, 109 (14%) had positive antibody results (Anti-AChR, 105; Anti-MuSK, 4). Among them, one patient with anti-AChR positivity was classified as a false positive (suspected thymic hyperplasia without neurologic symptoms). The remaining 108 patients were classified as true positives, resulting in a calculated PPV of 99%.
conclusionsWe found that anti-AChR/MuSK fixed CBA had excellent PPV for MG. Anti-AChR positivity in one asymptomatic patient with suspected thymic hyperplasia was classified as a false positive result, although the possibility that it represents a true marker of thymic pathology in a patient who may later develop MG is challenging to exclude. The high PPV reported herein supports the use of anti-AChR/MuSK fixed CBA as first-line testing for suspected MG.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.