Trial reportEuropean journal of neurology2025
Preventing Cardiomyopathy in Duchenne Muscular Dystrophy: Long-Term Follow-Up of Patients in the Randomised, Placebo-Controlled Drug-Trial of Perindopril and Bisoprolol.
Trial report in European journal of neurology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- The Importance of Early Diagnosis and Treatment to Limit the Impact of Dystrophic Cardiomyopathy-We've Seen This Film Before, and We Didn't Like the Ending.Journal of cardiovascular development and disease · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors.
Funding
Abstract
introductionIt is uncertain whether using cardiac drugs prophylactically in combinations for DMD is better than ACE-inhibitor alone. Our previous study showed no differences in left ventricular function between perindopril-bisoprolol and matched placebo after 36 months.
methodsThis study aimed to determine whether heart measures diverged after 60-month total follow-up. All participants had commenced open-label perindopril and bisoprolol when the original study ended. All were reconsented for access to heart measures, undertaken as part of their clinical care. The primary outcome was the change in echo-measured ventricular ejection fraction from baseline according to original randomization.
resultsOf 75 participants reported originally, 65 (aged 16 ± 2.5 years) were re-recruited and had data for analysis. Adjusted primary outcomes included 44 participants (original arms: 'active' 21; 'placebo' 23), 48 for secondary outcomes, and 65 for 'headcount' analysis of those with ventricular dysfunction. Absolute LVEF% values reduced in both groups ('active': 62.5% ± 5.6% to 53.8% ± 4.0%; 'placebo': 60.6% ± 4.9% to 50.4% ± 8.5%). Despite trends favoring earlier introduction of therapy, change from baseline was similar between groups (adjusted mean difference: -7.7 (95% CI -16.4 to1.0%)). However, more in the 'placebo' arm had died, had reduced LVEF%, and were taking additional heart medications.
conclusionWhile some patients may have benefited from 'early' (active) as opposed to 'delayed' (placebo) initiation of perindopril and bisoprolol, group-mean ventricular function did not differ between study arms after 60 months. Small numbers, absence of a control group, insensitivity of echo-ejection fraction, and additional drug use probably prevented divergence between groups.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.