Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40130373›Full record

ArticleEuropean journal of public health2025

Public health competencies: what does the next generation of professionals deem important?

Monica-Georgiana Brînzac, Marieke Verschuuren, Lore Leighton, Robert Otok

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in European journal of public health, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Teaching Systems Thinking in Postgraduate Public Health: A Scoping Review of Curricular Approaches.Health promotion journal of Australia : official journal of Australian Association of Health Promotion Professionals · 2026
    Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Monica-Georgiana BrînzacEUPHA, Utrecht, Netherlands.
Marieke VerschuurenEUPHA, Utrecht, Netherlands.
Lore LeightonASPHER, Brussels, Belgium.
Robert OtokASPHER, Brussels, Belgium.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

To adequately address many complex societal challenges, the public health workforce needs to learn new competencies. It is of particular interest to know what young people consider important in this regard, as they represent the future generation of public health professionals. Public health students and early career professionals in Europe were asked by means of an online questionnaire which of the competencies included in the 2020 WHO-ASPHER Competency Framework for the Public Health Workforce in the European Region they deemed most important for their future careers, and how well prepared they felt to execute these competencies in practice. In total, 127 respondents were included from 25 countries. They ranked Promoting health, Science and practice, and Leadership and systems thinking as the most important competency areas for their future careers. The first two were also the competencies for which the respondents felt best prepared, while they felt less prepared for Leadership and systems thinking. Other competencies that they felt less prepared for were Law, policies, and ethics; Governance and resource management; and One health and health security. This study shows a mismatch between what young professionals deem most important and what they feel best prepared for. The respondents did not feel well prepared for several competencies that are vital for a well-equipped future public health workforce. Public health in Europe would benefit from a unified public health curriculum that implies a list of mandatory competencies and a closer collaboration between academia with students and young professionals and the public health sector.

Indexed as

Professional CompetencePublic HealthAdultEducation, Public Health ProfessionalEuropeFemaleHumansLeadershipMaleSurveys and QuestionnairesYoung Adult

Identifiers

PMID40130373
PMCPMC11933798

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.