Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40130326›Full record

ArticleMedical education2025

Navigating neurodivergence: A scoping review to guide health professions educators.

Laura Gray, Bryony McNeill, Laura Pecora, Susie Macfarlane, Alexa Hayley, Danielle Hitch, Sherryn Evans

Abstract readScoping Review
In one paragraph

Article in Medical education, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Laura GrayThe Damion Drapac Centre for Equity in Health Professions Education & School of Medicine, Deakin University, Geelong, Australia.ORCID 0000-0002-7903-5796
Bryony McNeillInstitute for Mental and Physical Health and Clinical Translation & School of Medicine, Deakin University, Geelong, Australia.ORCID 0000-0002-1580-2925
Laura PecoraSchool of Psychology, Deakin University, Burwood, Australia.ORCID 0000-0002-3443-9498
Susie MacfarlaneDeakin Learning Futures/Faculty of Health Learning Innovation, Deakin University, Burwood, Australia.ORCID 0000-0002-8904-8945
Alexa HayleySchool of Psychology, Deakin University, Burwood, Australia.ORCID 0000-0002-7475-2542
Danielle HitchSchool of Health and Social Development & Institute for Health Transformation, Deakin University, Burwood, Australia.ORCID 0000-0003-2798-2246
Sherryn EvansSchool of Psychology, Deakin University, Burwood, Australia.ORCID 0000-0001-8783-7564

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionTo create inclusive learning environments where neurodivergent students can learn and thrive, educators must appreciate their unique perspectives and experiences. This is particularly crucial in health professions courses, where students may face additional pressures as they undertake placements in clinical environments where neurodivergence is misrepresented or misunderstood. A comprehensive review of the existing literature is necessary to identify the available data to guide educators and pinpoint areas that warrant further exploration.

methodsScoping review methodology, informed by the Joanna Briggs Institute approach, was used to guide a search of four electronic databases (MEDLINE, CINHAL, ERIC and PsycINFO), considering sources of primary data and analysis published up to June 2024. The retrieved literature was screened based on the inclusion criteria. Bibliographic data was extracted, and the included papers (n = 69) were reviewed and the themes charted using a framework approach.

resultsAnalysis of the included literature indicated some clear trends over time, with earlier papers predominantly focussing on dyslexia or framing neurodiverg as a form of disability. More recently there has been an increase in the number of papers specifically exploring the experiences of students identifying as neurodivergent, or the perspectives of educators. Narratives evident in the literature centred around relationships between a neurodivergent identity and a developing professional identity, challenges around disclosure, seeking effective accommodations in a stigmatising environment and the impact of educator perspectives. DISCUSSION: Although the framing of neurodivergence has changed over time, a consistent finding is that neurodivergent students in health professions programmes are expected to conform to learning environments that exclude them and do not support their learning. Further evidence is required to inform recommendations for educators on how to provide safer learning environments which enable neurodivergent students to thrive.

Indexed as

Health OccupationsHumansLearning

Identifiers

PMID40130326
PMCPMC12438025

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.