Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40130265›Full record

ArticleOphthalmology science

In Vivo Noncontact Imaging of Conjunctival Goblet Cells with Customized Widefield Fluorescence Microscopy.

Yushuang Liu, Zhengyu Duan, Zhongzhou Luo, Runze Zhang, Jiaxiong Li, Jinze Zhang, Zeyu Meng, Bowen Wang, Jin Yuan, Peng Xiao

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Ophthalmology science. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Yushuang LiuState Key Laboratory of Ophthalmology, Zhongshan Ophthalmic Centre, Guangdong Provincial Key Laboratory of Ophthalmology and Visual Science, Guangdong Provincial Clinical Research Centre for Ocular Diseases, Sun Yat-Sen University, Guangzhou, China.
Zhengyu DuanState Key Laboratory of Ophthalmology, Zhongshan Ophthalmic Centre, Guangdong Provincial Key Laboratory of Ophthalmology and Visual Science, Guangdong Provincial Clinical Research Centre for Ocular Diseases, Sun Yat-Sen University, Guangzhou, China.
Zhongzhou LuoState Key Laboratory of Ophthalmology, Zhongshan Ophthalmic Centre, Guangdong Provincial Key Laboratory of Ophthalmology and Visual Science, Guangdong Provincial Clinical Research Centre for Ocular Diseases, Sun Yat-Sen University, Guangzhou, China.
Runze ZhangState Key Laboratory of Ophthalmology, Zhongshan Ophthalmic Centre, Guangdong Provincial Key Laboratory of Ophthalmology and Visual Science, Guangdong Provincial Clinical Research Centre for Ocular Diseases, Sun Yat-Sen University, Guangzhou, China.
Jiaxiong LiState Key Laboratory of Ophthalmology, Zhongshan Ophthalmic Centre, Guangdong Provincial Key Laboratory of Ophthalmology and Visual Science, Guangdong Provincial Clinical Research Centre for Ocular Diseases, Sun Yat-Sen University, Guangzhou, China.
Jinze ZhangState Key Laboratory of Ophthalmology, Zhongshan Ophthalmic Centre, Guangdong Provincial Key Laboratory of Ophthalmology and Visual Science, Guangdong Provincial Clinical Research Centre for Ocular Diseases, Sun Yat-Sen University, Guangzhou, China.
Zeyu MengState Key Laboratory of Ophthalmology, Zhongshan Ophthalmic Centre, Guangdong Provincial Key Laboratory of Ophthalmology and Visual Science, Guangdong Provincial Clinical Research Centre for Ocular Diseases, Sun Yat-Sen University, Guangzhou, China.
Bowen WangState Key Laboratory of Ophthalmology, Zhongshan Ophthalmic Centre, Guangdong Provincial Key Laboratory of Ophthalmology and Visual Science, Guangdong Provincial Clinical Research Centre for Ocular Diseases, Sun Yat-Sen University, Guangzhou, China.
Jin YuanState Key Laboratory of Ophthalmology, Zhongshan Ophthalmic Centre, Guangdong Provincial Key Laboratory of Ophthalmology and Visual Science, Guangdong Provincial Clinical Research Centre for Ocular Diseases, Sun Yat-Sen University, Guangzhou, China.
Peng XiaoState Key Laboratory of Ophthalmology, Zhongshan Ophthalmic Centre, Guangdong Provincial Key Laboratory of Ophthalmology and Visual Science, Guangdong Provincial Clinical Research Centre for Ocular Diseases, Sun Yat-Sen University, Guangzhou, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Purpose: Conjunctival goblet cells (CGCs) play a crucial role in maintaining ocular surface health by producing mucins. However, assessing CGC changes in ocular diseases remains limited by invasive techniques and subjective evaluations. This study aims to develop a noncontact cellular resolution fluorescence microscopy for in vivo CGC imaging and investigate CGC dynamics in a dry eye disease (DED) mouse model. Design: Experimental study. Subjects: Freshly ex vivo porcine eyes, New Zealand white rabbits, and C57BL/6 mice. Methods: Based on the intrinsic fluorescence properties of moxifloxacin, a high-resolution noncontact widefield fluorescence microscopy (WFFM) was customized with an all-in-focus algorithm to optimize in vivo CGC imaging over the curved conjunctival surface. A DED mouse model was established by topically applying 0.2% benzalkonium chloride (BAC) to the ocular surface daily for 7 days, followed by a 7-day recovery period without BAC. In vivo CGC alterations were assessed using WFFM on days 0, 3, 7, and 14. Additional assessments included the phenol red thread tear test, corneal sodium fluorescein staining, and periodic acid-Schiff (PAS) assay. Main Outcome Measures: Conjunctival goblet cell density and area ratio. Results: The WFFM system achieved a cellular resolution of 1 μm and a field of view of 1.4 mm × 1.4 mm. Imaging validation in mice and rabbits allowed for the distinguishing and quantitative assessment of individual CGCs or clusters on the curved conjunctival surface in vivo. Significant reductions in CGC density and area ratio on days 3 and 7 after BAC induction were observed in DED mouse in vivo with WFFM, with their values returning to the baseline 7 days after BAC removal, which was consistent with PAS staining results. Conclusions: The customized WFFM enables in vivo cellular imaging of CGCs, offering a safe and accurate method for continuous monitoring of CGC pathophysiology in ocular surface diseases such as DED. Financial Disclosures: Proprietary or commercial disclosure may be found in the Footnotes and Disclosures at the end of this article.

Indexed as

Cellular imagingConjunctival goblet cellsDry eye diseaseNoncontact imaging

Identifiers

PMID40130265
PMCPMC11930793

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.