Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40130244›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in medicine2025

Skin-lesion segmentation using boundary-aware segmentation network and classification based on a mixture of convolutional and transformer neural networks.

Javaria Amin, Marium Azhar, Habiba Arshad, Amad Zafar, Seong-Han Kim

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in medicine, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Demographic Reporting and the Absence of Hispanic/Latino Representation in Dermatology Artificial Intelligence: A Scoping Review.Skin research and technology : official journal of International Society for Bioengineering and the Skin (ISBS) [and] International Society for Digital Imaging of Skin (ISDIS) [and] International Society for Skin Imaging (ISSI) · 2026
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Javaria Amin *Rawalpindi Woman University, Rawalpindi, Pakistan.
Marium AzharDepartment of Computer Science, University of Wah, Wah Cantt, Pakistan.
Habiba ArshadDepartment of Computer Science, University of Wah, Wah Cantt, Pakistan.
Amad Zafar *Department of Artificial Intelligence and Robotics, Sejong University, Seoul, Republic of Korea.
Seong-Han KimDepartment of Artificial Intelligence and Robotics, Sejong University, Seoul, Republic of Korea.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Skin cancer is one of the most prevalent cancers worldwide. In the clinical domain, skin lesions such as melanoma detection are still a challenge due to occlusions, poor contrast, poor image quality, and similarities between skin lesions. Deep-/machine-learning methods are used for the early, accurate, and efficient detection of skin lesions. Therefore, we propose a boundary-aware segmentation network (BASNet) model comprising prediction and residual refinement modules. Materials and methods: The prediction module works like a U-Net and is densely supervised by an encoder and decoder. A hybrid loss function is used, which has the potential to help in the clinical domain of dermatology. BASNet handles these challenges by providing robust outcomes, even in suboptimal imaging environments. This leads to accurate early diagnosis, improved treatment outcomes, and efficient clinical workflows. We further propose a compact convolutional transformer model (CCTM) based on convolution and transformers for classification. This was designed on a selected number of layers and hyperparameters having two convolutions, two transformers, 64 projection dimensions, tokenizer, position embedding, sequence pooling, MLP, 64 batch size, two heads, 0.1 stochastic depth, 0.001 learning rate, 0.0001 weight decay, and 100 epochs. Results: The CCTM model was evaluated on six skin-lesion datasets, namely MED-NODE, PH2, ISIC-2019, ISIC-2020, HAM10000, and DermNet datasets, achieving over 98% accuracy. Conclusion: The proposed model holds significant potential in the clinical domain. Its ability to combine local feature extraction and global context understanding makes it ideal for tasks like medical image analysis and disease diagnosis.

Indexed as

compact convolution transformerdermoscopyhybrid lossResNet-34skin lesiontokenizer

Identifiers

PMID40130244
PMCPMC11931128

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.