ArticleJournal of arrhythmia2025
Risk stratification of elderly patients with Brugada syndrome: Results from a large Japanese cohort of idiopathic ventricular fibrillation.
Article in Journal of arrhythmia, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Risk stratification of elderly patients with Brugada syndrome: Results from a large Japanese cohort of idiopathic ventricular fibrillation.Journal of arrhythmia · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Brugada syndrome (BrS) is an inherited cardiac channelopathy associated with a high risk of sudden cardiac death (SCD) due to ventricular fibrillation (VF). Although implantable cardioverter-defibrillators (ICDs) are the primary therapy for SCD prevention, the risk stratification of elderly patients with BrS remains unclear. This study aimed to evaluate the incidence and risk factors of life-threatening arrhythmias in elderly patients with BrS. Methods: We analyzed 523 patients with BrS (mean age 51 ± 13 years, 497 men) enrolled in the multicenter prospective Japan Idiopathic Ventricular Fibrillation Study. Patients were categorized into the elderly (>60 years, Results: During a mean follow-up of 106 ± 62 months, 59 patients (11%) experienced CE. The annual CE incidence was lower in the elderly group than in the nonelderly group (0.7% vs. 1.5%, Conclusions: Elderly patients with BrS have a better prognosis than nonelderly patients, particularly if they are asymptomatic. A history of VF is a key risk factor for life-threatening arrhythmias in elderly patients with BrS.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.