Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40130146›Full record

ArticleCureus2025

Analysis of the Association of Mobile Phone Usage and Hearing Function in Young Adults.

Ahmed I Haji, Haris Ejaz, Moaz O Omar, Mohamad B Takriti, Sareesh N Narayanan

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Cureus, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Ahmed I HajiInternal Medicine, Ras Al Khaimah College of Medical Sciences, Ras Al Khaimah Medical and Health Sciences University, Ras Al Khaimah, ARE.
Haris EjazAnesthesia and Critical Care, Ras Al Khaimah College of Medical Sciences, Ras Al Khaimah Medical and Health Sciences University, Ras Al Khaimah, ARE.
Moaz O OmarPhysiology, Ras Al Khaimah College of Medical Sciences, Ras Al Khaimah Medical and Health Sciences University, Ras Al Khaimah, ARE.
Mohamad B TakritiGeneral Surgery, Ras Al Khaimah College of Medical Sciences, Ras Al Khaimah Medical and Health Sciences University, Ras Al Khaimah, ARE.
Sareesh N NarayananPhysiology, Ras Al Khaimah College of Medical Sciences, Ras Al Khaimah Medical and Health Sciences University, Ras Al Khaimah, ARE.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe health effects of radiofrequency electromagnetic radiation (RF-EMR), especially 4G and 5G, have been the subject of recent debate. The impact of this technology, particularly the nonthermal biological effects on humans and other animals has been largely ignored and not been comprehensively evaluated. Billions of people use this technology all over the globe today, and a significant percentage of them are in the adolescent age group. Therefore, a minor incidence of any adverse effect on health would be a major public health issue on a long-term basis.

aimThe current study was designed to determine the association between long-, intermediate-, and/or short-term RF-EMR exposure from mobile phones on hearing ability in vulnerable populations like young adults. MATERIALS AND

methodsSeventy-eight young adults (aged 17-24 years) were recruited after obtaining their informed consent. First, a validated questionnaire was used to obtain the extent of phone usage among participants. They were then grouped as long-term, intermediate-term, and short-term users as per the criteria, and later their hearing ability was tested by pure tone audiometry.

resultsAmong the 78 participants, 40 (51.28%) were males and 38 (48.71%) were females. Sixty-four (82.05%) of the participants responded that the right ear was their dominant ear, and for the remaining 14 (17.95%), it was the left ear. Forty-five participants (57.69%) use a 4G phone, while 32 (41.02%) use a 5G, and only one participant (1.28%) uses a 2G phone. Forty-five participants (57.69%) use the phone primarily for texting, while 33 (42.30%) use it to make calls. Fifty-four participants (69.23%) firmly attached the phone over their ears while making/receiving a call, but 24 (30.76%) did not. Fifty-nine participants (75.64%) did not feel any discomfort, but 11 (14.10%) felt a headache, one (1.28%) felt nausea, and seven (8.97%) experienced tinnitus during a call. In audiometry, mild to moderate hearing loss was evident in all three groups of participants at frequencies 250 Hz, 500 Hz, and 1000 Hz. The hearing loss was evident in individuals who have used their phones for more than 30 min/day for five years continuously compared to individuals who have used their phones 30 min/day for four years and/or 30 min/day for less than three years. This pattern was similar in both the right and left ears. Ear dominance did not play a significant role in influencing hearing loss in participants. However, significant hearing loss was found in 4G phone users compared to 5G phone users at 250 Hz and 500 Hz but not with frequencies between 1000 Hz and 8000 Hz particularly in the left ear. Moreover, irrespective of the participant's per-day average call duration, the hearing loss was evident at frequencies 250-1000Hz in both the left and right ears compared to other frequencies.

conclusionLong-term mobile phone use led to mild to moderate hearing loss, at frequencies 250 Hz, 500 Hz, and 1000 Hz. Ear dominance did not play a significant role in influencing hearing loss in participants. However, significant hearing loss was found in 4G phone users compared to 5G phone users at 250 Hz and 500 Hz but not with other frequencies. Further research is required to validate these results and understand RF-EMR effects on hearing in vulnerable populations like young adults.

Indexed as

5ghearingmobile phoneradiofrequency electromagnetic radiationyoung adults

Identifiers

PMID40130146
PMCPMC11930783

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.