Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40130135›Full record

ArticleCureus2025

Effect of Whole Lung Lavage for Pulmonary Alveolar Proteinosis on Circulatory Dynamics: A Case Report.

Junichi Sato, Tomohiro Chaki, Chinami Kaga, Mariko Ikeshima, Michiaki Yamakage

Abstract readCase Reports
In one paragraph

Article in Cureus, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Junichi SatoDepartment of Anesthesiology, Sapporo Medical University School of Medicine, Sapporo, JPN.
Tomohiro ChakiDepartment of Anesthesiology, Sapporo Medical University School of Medicine, Sapporo, JPN.
Chinami KagaDepartment of Anesthesiology, Sapporo Medical University School of Medicine, Sapporo, JPN.
Mariko IkeshimaDepartment of Anesthesiology, Sapporo Medical University School of Medicine, Sapporo, JPN.
Michiaki YamakageDepartment of Anesthesiology, Sapporo Medical University School of Medicine, Sapporo, JPN.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Whole lung lavage (WLL) is a standard treatment for severe pulmonary alveolar proteinosis (PAP) and is performed under general anesthesia. However, the management of anesthesia in PAP patients poses significant challenges due to their compromised respiratory function. Additionally, the instillation of large volumes of normal saline during WLL may adversely affect circulatory dynamics. In this case report, we examined the impact of WLL on circulatory parameters in a patient with severe PAP. A 71-year-old male diagnosed with idiopathic PAP underwent WLL under general anesthesia. Each lung was instilled with 1,000 mL of normal saline, followed by drainage in a series of 10 cycles per lung. Hemodynamic parameters were monitored throughout the procedure. Statistical analyses were performed to evaluate changes in circulatory values before and after saline instillation and to compare differences in hemodynamic responses between the right- and left-sided WLL. Our findings demonstrated that saline instillation during WLL significantly suppressed cardiac output. Furthermore, the suppression of circulatory function was more pronounced during right-sided WLL compared with left-sided WLL. These observations highlight the critical need for careful hemodynamic monitoring and management during WLL to ensure patient safety and optimize outcomes.

Indexed as

anesthesiologycardiac output monitoringcirculatory dynamicspulmonary alveolar proteinosiswhole lung lavage

Identifiers

PMID40130135
PMCPMC11930649

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.