ArticleCureus2025
Assesment of Functional and Radiological Outcomes of Proximal Tibia Fractures Surgically Treated With Ilizarov Fixators.
Article in Cureus, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Treatment of Post-Traumatic Diaphyseal and Distal Tibial Bone Defects by Distraction Osteogenesis: A Monocentric Experience.Journal of clinical medicine · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction and objectives Ilizarov ring fixators have long been used in the case of shaft fractures of long bones and infected non-union. The use of primary Ilizarov ring fixators in an intra-articular fracture has always been controversial and has its own set of requirements and challenges. We wanted to analyse the functional and radiological outcome of proximal tibia fractures and look for any complications that may develop during the postoperative follow-up period. Materials and methods This was a prospective observational study conducted on patients operated upon at a tertiary care centre in Odisha, India. This study included patients aged 16-70 years who had presented to the emergency or the outpatient department with displaced proximal tibia fractures of Shatzker type three to six. Exclusion criteria included patients with floating knee, pathological fractures of proximal tibia, undisplaced proximal tibia fractures, patients beyond the age limits, congenital deformities, unwilling patients, patients managed conservatively for other medical reasons, and patients with neurovascular deficits following the trauma. The functional scores used for the same were the Knee injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (KOOS) and Association for the Study and Application of the Methods of Ilizarov (ASAMI) score and Rasmussen Radiological Score (RRS) was used for the radiological assessment of fracture site union. The participants were followed up at three weeks, six weeks, three months, six months, and 12 months. Results The patients had an average KOOS of 74.9 with the majority in the range of 75-100. The majority of the cases had an excellent ASAMI score. The RRS was found to be good in the majority of cases. All the patients were followed up for 12 months and an average of 7.4 months was observed for radiological union and Ilizarov frame removal. Conclusion Ilizarov ring fixator is an excellent device to aid in the union of the fractured fragments in case of proximal tibia fractures. This method aids in early weight bearing. It is a very versatile device and can also be used as a salvage procedure. However, the application of an Illizarov fixator has a slow learning curve. Excellent results can be achieved using an Ilizarov fixator by understanding its biomechanical properties and its principles.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.