ArticleCureus2025
Safe Sedation and Analgesia Management With Remifentanil in Pediatric ICU Patients: A Report of Two Cases.
Article in Cureus, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Evaluation of neurological outcomes after prolonged sedation among ICU patients: A prospective study in India.Bioinformation · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Although remifentanil (RF) is not approved for use in the ICU for children, its short half-life and titratability may provide advantages in children requiring high doses of sedatives and analgesics during prolonged mechanical ventilation. This report presents two pediatric cases in which RF was administered for sedation and analgesia, enabling successful extubation without adverse effects. In Case 1, a four-year-old girl with multiple atypical teratoid rhabdoid tumors required mechanical ventilation due to impaired consciousness. RF was initiated at 0.22 μg/kg/min and titrated up to 0.48 μg/kg/min on the day before extubation, allowing the reduction of other sedatives. She received RF for a total of 16 hours (5.66 mg) before it was discontinued, and extubation was successfully performed 70 minutes later. In Case 2, a three-year-old girl with a severe neck abscess required prolonged intubation following surgical drainage. RF was started at 0.1 μg/kg/min and increased to 0.2 μg/kg/min on the day before extubation, facilitating the tapering of other sedatives. She received RF for a total of 23 hours (4.4 mg) before discontinuation, and extubation was successfully performed 25 minutes later. Throughout RF administration, hemodynamic stability was maintained, with no occurrences of hypotension, bradycardia, desaturation, hepatic or renal dysfunction, muscle rigidity, or hyperalgesia. No additional catecholamines were required, and no signs of withdrawal symptoms were observed. These findings suggest that RF may be a safe and effective option for sedation and analgesia in pediatric patients undergoing prolonged mechanical ventilation.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.