Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40130111›Full record

ReviewCureus2025

Cryoneurolysis: A Comprehensive Review of Applications in Pain Management.

Saniyah Shaikh, Aqsa R Khan, Sanjoli Saini, Anum Naimat, Chaithanya Amudha, Dhyaan Bannur, Eniola Ajayi, Afrah Rehman, Sukesh Shah, Najiyah M Fakhruddin and 2 more

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Cureus, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors.

Saniyah ShaikhInternal Medicine, Alfaisal University College of Medicine, Riyadh, SAU.
Aqsa R KhanInternal Medicine, Foundation University Medical College, Islamabad, PAK.
Sanjoli SainiInternal Medicine, Max Healthcare and Indian Institute of Management, Kashipur, IND.
Anum NaimatInternal Medicine, Fatima Memorial Hospital (FMH) College of Medicine and Dentistry, Lahore, PAK.
Chaithanya AmudhaMedicine and Surgery, Saveetha Medical College and Hospital, Chennai, IND.
Dhyaan BannurBasic Sciences, University of Texas at Dallas, Richardson, USA.
Eniola AjayiResearch, Henry Ford Hospitals, Detroit, USA.
Afrah RehmanDentistry, University of Georgia, Tbilisi, GEO.
Sukesh ShahMedicine, American University of Integrative Sciences School of Medicine, Bridgetown, BRB.
Najiyah M FakhruddinInternal Medicine, Norman Bethune Medical College, Jilin, CHN.
Nafrin KormathInternal Medicine, Muslim Educational Society (MES) Medical College Hospital, Perinthalmanna, IND.
Maneeth MylavarapuPublic Health, Adelphi University, Garden City, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Pain management is an integral part of healthcare, and cryoneurolysis, a technique that uses extreme cold to disrupt nerve conduction, has demonstrated potential in managing both acute and chronic pain. It is an alternative for patients who do not respond to traditional pain management therapies. This review examines the efficacy, application, mechanism, limitations, challenges, and advancements in cryoneurolysis. Cryoneurolysis has broad applications, including acute pain management, reducing opioid dependency, and shortening hospital stays. It effectively treats chronic pain conditions like lumbar facet syndrome, phantom limb pain, occipital neuralgia, and, in some cases, unresponsiveness to traditional therapies. Furthermore, it offers values in tumor-induced neuropathies and postoperative pain. Cryoneurolysis has a favorable safety profile, presenting a low risk of minor complications such as infection and bruising, which resolve with proper care. Comparative studies indicate that cryoneurolysis, which induces Wallerian degeneration, is as effective as cooled radiofrequency ablation (CRFA), which achieves thermal nerve degradation to block pain transmission, particularly in knee osteoarthritis. However, its potential limitations impede widespread adoption, including small sample sizes, study heterogeneity, and the lack of standardized protocols. Future research should focus on large-scale trials, comparative studies with other pain management modalities, and developing standardized guidelines to enhance clinical outcomes.

Indexed as

acute paincryoablationcryoneurolysisoncological painwallerian degeneration

Identifiers

PMID40130111
PMCPMC11931670

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.