Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40130079›Full record

ReviewBioactive materials2025

Unraveling osteogenesis mechanisms of the empowered VitaFlux adaptive regeneration biomaterials for bone tissue engineering: Insights into the role of BBGs/BSBGs.

Xian Li, Kun Su, Limin Zhao, Hao Zhang, Qiang Yang, Ping Du, Xiaofeng Chen, Haobo Pan

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Bioactive materials, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Xian LiShenzhen Key Laboratory of Marine Biomedical Materials, CAS-HK Joint Lab of Biomaterials, Shenzhen Institutes of Advanced Technology, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Shenzhen, 518055, PR China.
Kun SuShenzhen Key Laboratory of Marine Biomedical Materials, CAS-HK Joint Lab of Biomaterials, Shenzhen Institutes of Advanced Technology, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Shenzhen, 518055, PR China.
Limin ZhaoShenzhen Healthemes Biotechnology Co. Ltd, Shenzhen, 518102, PR China.
Hao ZhangShenzhen Key Laboratory of Marine Biomedical Materials, CAS-HK Joint Lab of Biomaterials, Shenzhen Institutes of Advanced Technology, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Shenzhen, 518055, PR China.
Qiang YangDepartment of Spine Surgery, Tianjin Hospital, Tianjin University, Tianjin, 300211, PR China.
Ping DuShenzhen Key Laboratory of Marine Biomedical Materials, CAS-HK Joint Lab of Biomaterials, Shenzhen Institutes of Advanced Technology, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Shenzhen, 518055, PR China.
Xiaofeng ChenNational Engineering Research Center for Tissue Restoration and Reconstruction, Guangzhou, 510006, PR China.
Haobo PanShenzhen Key Laboratory of Marine Biomedical Materials, CAS-HK Joint Lab of Biomaterials, Shenzhen Institutes of Advanced Technology, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Shenzhen, 518055, PR China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Bone tissue engineering materials are crucial for bone repair, but existing repair materials still face many challenges, including poor biocompatibility and bioactivity, slow self-repair processes, limited adaptability, inability to promote angiogenesis and so on. To address these issues, the development of third-generation bone repair materials, which are being designed to stimulate specific cellular responses at the molecular level, such as borate and borosilicate bioactive glasses (BBGs/BSBGs) that activate cells and genes, offers new potential for promoting bone tissue self-renewing. Their unique characteristic lies in a flow of life-giving energy, releasing beneficial ions such as boron, calcium and silicon to stimulate cell proliferation and differentiation, accelerating the regeneration of bones. Through this dynamic repair mechanism, these VitaFlux glasses operate like a "living system" within the body, not only speeding up the healing of damaged tissues but also interacting seamlessly with surrounding tissues during the repair process. In this review, we provide a comprehensive analysis of the current understanding of the osteogenesis mechanisms of BBGs/BSBGs, emphasizing their interactions with cells, including ion release and exchange, protein adsorption, and cell adhesion. We also examine key osteogenic signaling pathways related to the alkaline and ionic microenvironments of BBGs/BSBGs, such as the cell cycle, Wnt, MAPK, and BMP signaling pathways, along with macrophage polarization and angiogenesis. Additionally, strategies and future prospects for advancing BBGs/BSBGs research are discussed. Special attention is given to the NaBC1 and GPCR-mediated signaling pathways, which require further investigation.

Indexed as

Alkaline microenvironmentBioactive glasses (BGs)Bone tissue engineeringBorate and borosilicate bioactive glasses (BBGs/BSBGs)ImmunomodulationOsteogenesis

Identifiers

PMID40130079
PMCPMC11932761

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.