ArticleWorld journal of clinical oncology2025
Scoring system supporting suture decision-making for duodenal submucosal tumors.
Article in World journal of clinical oncology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundIn recent years, endoscopic resection (ER) has been employed for the excision of submucosal tumors (SMTs). Nonetheless, ER in the duodenum is linked to elevated risks of both immediate and delayed hemorrhagic complications and perforations. Satisfactory suturing is crucial for reducing the occurrence of complications.
aimTo establish a clinical score model for supporting suture decision-making of duodenal SMTs.
methodsThis study included 137 individuals diagnosed with duodenal SMTs who underwent ER. Participants were evenly divided into two groups: A training cohort (TC) comprising 95 cases and an internal validation cohort (VC) with 42 cases. Subsequently, a scoring system was formulated utilizing multivariate logistic regression analysis within the TC, which was then subjected to evaluation in the VC.
resultsThe clinical scoring system incorporated two key factors: Extraluminal growth, which was assigned 2 points, and endoscopic full-thickness resection, which was given 3 points. This model demonstrated strong predictive accuracy, as evidenced by the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve of 0.900 (95% confidence interval: 0.823-0.976). Additionally, the model's goodness-of-fit was validated by the Hosmer-Lemeshow test (
conclusionThis scoring system may function as a beneficial instrumentality for medical practitioners, facilitating the decision-making process concerning suture techniques in the context of duodenal SMTs.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.