ArticleWorld journal of clinical oncology2025
Validation of the prognostic model for palliative radiotherapy in older patients with cancer.
Article in World journal of clinical oncology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundOlder patients are more likely to have a poor performance status and comorbidities. There is a reluctance to extensively investigate and treat older patients. As elderly individuals and patients with neoplasms each increase in number, palliative treatment of older patients is expected to grow as an issue.
aimTo investigated the role of palliative radiotherapy in older patients and patients who were expected to demonstrate a therapeutic effect.
methodsFrom February 2019 to February 2022, 33 patients aged ≥ 80 years underwent palliative radiotherapy. The prognosis in palliative care study predictor (PiPS), palliative prognostic index (PPI), and delirium-palliative prognostic score (D-PaP) models were used for prognosis prediction. D-PaP scores calculated according to the doctor's prediction of clinical prediction of survival (CPS) were excluded and then analyzed for comparison. Radiation was prescribed at a dose of 2.5-7 Gy per fraction, up to a median of 39 Gy
resultsThe median follow-up was 2.4 months (range, 0.2-27.5 months), and 28 patients (84.8%) showed subjective symptom improvements following treatment. The 2- and 6-month survival rates of all patients were 91.5% and 91.5%, respectively. According to regression analysis, the performance status index, symptom type, and radiation dose all showed no significant correlation with the treatment response. When survival was expected for > 55 days in the PiPS model, the 2-month survival rate was 94.4%. For patients with PPI and D-PaP-CPS values of 0-3.9 points, the 2-month survival rates were 90.0% and 100%, respectively. For patients with a score of ≥ 4 points, the 2-month survival rates were 37.5% and 0%, respectively.
conclusionThis study shows that the prognosis prediction model used in palliative care can be used to identify patients suitable for treatment.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.