Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40130023›Full record

ArticleJournal of cognition2025

Habituation in Predictability-Modulations of Stimulus-Response Binding.

Philip Schmalbrock, Jan Theeuwes, Christian Frings

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of cognition, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Philip SchmalbrockDepartment of Psychology, University of Trier, DE.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9352-6620
Jan TheeuwesVrije Universiteit Amsterdam, NL.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5849-7721
Christian FringsDepartment of Psychology, University of Trier, DE.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Acting intentionally requires the integration of perceptual with action information in a common representational format. In the action control literature, this integrated representation is often called event file and is measured in so-called stimulus-response binding effects. These effects allow us to measure the strength of this shared representation and the impact it can have on behavior. A well-established finding is that particular variables can modulate the size of binding effects - one recently discovered modulator is

Indexed as

Action ControlHabituationPredictabilityS-R binding effectStatistical Regularities

Identifiers

PMID40130023
PMCPMC11931097

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.