ArticleJournal of Taibah University Medical Sciences2025
Evaluation of the effectiveness of intermittent fasting versus caloric restriction in weight loss and improving cardiometabolic health: A systematic review and meta-analysis.
Article in Journal of Taibah University Medical Sciences, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Intermittent fasting to treat diabetes: time to update clinical practice guidelines.The lancet. Diabetes & endocrinology · 2026Review
- Dietary and Pharmacological Modulation of Aging-Related Metabolic Pathways: Molecular Insights, Clinical Evidence, and a Translational Model.International journal of molecular sciences · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Dietary interventions, particularly intermittent fasting (IF) and energy restriction (ER), have emerged as effective strategies for managing weight. Objective: We aimed to conduct a systematic review and meta-analysis exploring the effects of IF and ER on body weight and cardiometabolic factors. Methods: PRISMA compliant methods were used, and PubMed and the Cochrane CENTRAL Library were systematically searched for relevant randomized controlled trials (RCTs) from database inception to September 27, 2023. A bibliographic and gray literature search was also performed to identify unpublished literature. Effect sizes were pooled with random effects models in the R package "meta" and are reported as mean differences with 95 % confidence intervals. The quality of the included studies was assessed with The Cochrane Risk of Bias assessment tool. Results: A total of 2931 records were identified through a database search. The study included 17 publications: 16 RCTs identified after two stages of screening and an additional publication identified from a bibliographic search. All trials were published between 2011 and 2022, and included a total of 1258 participants (24-209 per study). Pooled analysis revealed that IF led to a more significant decrease in BMI than ER (-0.44 [-0.88 to -0.01]; p < 0.01). Additionally, IF resulted in a slightly greater, but statistically nonsignificant, decrease in weight, triglyceride levels, fasting plasma glucose, and diastolic blood pressure than ER. However, similar decreases in SBP, LDL, and HDL levels were observed between IF and ER, which showed no major differences. The ER group experienced a higher frequency of headaches than the IF group, whereas the IF group reported a greater occurrence of dizziness than the ER group. Conclusion: IF appears to be slightly advantageous over ER in terms of body weight, cardiometabolic factors, and plasma glucose levels.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.