ArticleMayo Clinic proceedings. Digital health2025
Retrospective Comparative Analysis of Prostate Cancer In-Basket Messages: Responses From Closed-Domain Large Language Models Versus Clinical Teams.
Article in Mayo Clinic proceedings. Digital health, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
15 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Artificial Intelligence (AI)-based tools in the diagnosis and management of prostate cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Prostate cancer and prostatic diseases · 2026Pooled it
- The daily dose: Early usability of an LLM tool for patient summaries and trial matching in radiation oncology.Clinical and translational radiation oncology · 2026Article
- Augmenting patient safety surveillance in radiation oncology with large language model-based root cause analysis: A proof-of-concept study.PLOS digital health · 2026Article
- Generative AI, foundation models and large language models in radiation therapy physics: Clinical applications, challenges, and future directions.Medical physics · 2026Review
- A scoping review of studies on secure messaging through patient portals: persistent challenges and potential solutions.npj health systems · 2026Article
- Large language models for bioinformatics.Quantitative biology (Beijing, China) · 2026Review
- Artificial intelligence chatbots in response to patient's common inquiries about chordoma: A cross-sectional study.Brain & spine · 2026Article
- AI-driven precision diagnosis and treatment of prostate cancer: a narrative review.Frontiers in oncology · 2026Review
- Personalizing prostate cancer education for patients using an EHR-Integrated LLM agent.NPJ digital medicine · 2025Article
- Using large language models to automate summarization of CT simulation orders in radiation oncology.Journal of applied clinical medical physics · 2025Article
- Article
- A systematic review of early evidence on generative AI for drafting responses to patient messages.npj health systems · 2025Article
- Large language model integrations in cancer decision-making: a systematic review and meta-analysis.NPJ digital medicine · 2025Article
- Article
- Retrieval-Augmented Generation in Oncology: Promises, Pitfalls, and Early Applications.AI in precision oncologyArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
14 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Objective: To evaluate the effectiveness of RadOnc-generative pretrained transformer (GPT), a GPT-4 based large language model, in assisting with in-basket message response generation for prostate cancer treatment, with the goal of reducing the workload and time on clinical care teams while maintaining response quality. Patients and Methods: RadOnc-GPT was integrated with electronic health records from both Mayo Clinic-wide databases and a radiation-oncology-specific database. The model was evaluated on 158 previously recorded in-basket message interactions, selected from 90 patients with nonmetastatic prostate cancer from the Mayo Clinic Department of Radiation Oncology in-basket message database in the calendar years 2022-2024. Quantitative natural language processing analysis and 2 grading studies, conducted by 5 clinicians and 4 nurses, were used to assess RadOnc-GPT's responses. Three primary clinicians independently graded all messages, whereas a fourth senior clinician reviewed 41 responses with relevant discrepancies, and a fifth senior clinician evaluated 2 additional responses. The grading focused on 5 key areas: completeness, correctness, clarity, empathy, and editing time. The grading study was performed from July 20, 2024 to December 15, 2024. Results: The RadOnc-GPT slightly outperformed the clinical care team in empathy, whereas achieving comparable scores with the clinical care team in completeness, correctness, and clarity. Five clinician graders identified key limitations in RadOnc-GPT's responses, such as lack of context, insufficient domain-specific knowledge, inability to perform essential meta-tasks, and hallucination. It was estimated that RadOnc-GPT could save an average of 5.2 minutes per message for nurses and 2.4 minutes for clinicians, from reading the inquiry to sending the response. Conclusion: RadOnc-GPT has the potential to considerably reduce the workload of clinical care teams by generating high-quality, timely responses for in-basket message interactions. This could lead to improved efficiency in health care workflows and reduced costs while maintaining or enhancing the quality of communication between patients and health care providers.Abbreviations and AcronymsAI; artificial intelligence; LLM; large language model; NLP; natural language processing; RadOnc-GPT; radiation oncology generative pretrained transformer.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.