ArticleFrontiers in immunology2025
Case Report: Successful management of refractory palmoplantar pustulosis with upadacitinib.
Article in Frontiers in immunology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Efficacy and safety of Janus kinase and TYK2 inhibitors in the treatment of generalized pustular psoriasis and palmoplantar pustulosis: a systematic review.Immunologic research · 2026Pooled it
- Janus Kinase Inhibitors for Treatment of Palmoplantar Pustulosis, Generalized Pustular Psoriasis, and Palmoplantar Pustular Psoriasis: A Systematic Review of the Literature.Health science reports · 2026Review
- IL-4Rα antagonist (Stapokibart) in refractory palmoplantar pustulosis: a case report and literature review of Th2-targeted therapies.Frontiers in immunology · 2026Review
- Targeting the JAK/STAT pathway in palmoplantar pustulosis: a review.Annals of medicine · 2025Review
- Vitamin D and skin disorders: bridging molecular insights to clinical innovations.Molecular medicine (Cambridge, Mass.) · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Palmoplantar Pustulosis (PPP) is a rare chronic skin disorder characterized by recurrent sterile pustules on palms and soles, leading to significant pain and functional impairment. Treatments include topical medications, phototherapy, systemic treatments, and biologics, but nonconclusive strategy exists. Here we report a case of a 66-year-old Chinese woman who developed refractory PPP after COVID-19 vaccination, characterized by painful, itchy pustules on her hands and feet. Initial treatments such as topical corticosteroids, calcipotriol, methotrexate, and cyclosporine were ineffective. Due to potential hypersensitivity reactions post-vaccination and elevated Immunoglobulin (Ig)E levels, anti-IgE therapy was administrated. Omalizumab treatment resulted some improvement, but noticeable symptoms persisted. Upon switching to upadacitinib, the patient experienced rapid and complete resolution of pustules and desquamation, with continued symptom control and no severe adverse reactions over a year. Throughout the treatment, clinical symptoms and the patient's quality of life were assessed using the Palmoplantar Pustular Psoriasis Area and Severity Index (PPP ASI), the Palmoplantar Pustulosis Physician Global Assessment (PPP PGA), and the Dermatology Life Quality Index (DLQI). Serum IgE and food-specific (FS)-IgG4 levels were monitored. Additionally, reductions in cytokine levels (interleukin (IL)-4, IL-13, IL-25, IL-33, and tumor necrosis factor (TNF)-α) were observed after upadacitinib treatment. This case highlights the potential of upadacitinib, as an effective treatment for PPP, emphasizing the need for further research into targeted therapies addressing multiple signaling pathways involved in PPP's pathogenesis.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.