Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40129969›Full record

ArticleJBMR plus2025

ADAM: automated digital phenotyping and morphological texture analysis of bone biopsy images using deep learning.

Satvika Bharadwaj, Florence Lima, Tilak Bahadur Pathak, Rohan Dhamdhere, Pingfu Fu, Hartmut Malluche, Madhumathi Rao, Anant Madabhushi

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in JBMR plus, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Satvika BharadwajWallace H. Coulter Department of Biomedical Engineering, Georgia Institute of Technology and Emory University, Atlanta, GA 30332, United States.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2700-2773
Florence LimaDivision of Nephrology, Bone and Mineral Metabolism, University of Kentucky, Lexington, KY 40508, United States.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3894-5224
Tilak Bahadur PathakWallace H. Coulter Department of Biomedical Engineering, Georgia Institute of Technology and Emory University, Atlanta, GA 30332, United States.
Rohan DhamdhereWallace H. Coulter Department of Biomedical Engineering, Georgia Institute of Technology and Emory University, Atlanta, GA 30332, United States.
Pingfu FuDepartment of Population and Quantitative Health Sciences, School of Medicine, Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, OH 44106, United States.
Hartmut MallucheDivision of Nephrology, Bone and Mineral Metabolism, University of Kentucky, Lexington, KY 40508, United States.
Madhumathi RaoDivision of Nephrology, Bone and Mineral Metabolism, University of Kentucky, Lexington, KY 40508, United States.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7489-521X
Anant MadabhushiWallace H. Coulter Department of Biomedical Engineering, Georgia Institute of Technology and Emory University, Atlanta, GA 30332, United States.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Histomorphometric analysis of undecalcified bone biopsy images provides quantitative assessment of bone turnover, volume, and mineralization using static and dynamic parameters. Traditionally, quantification has relied on manual annotation and tracing of relevant tissue structures, a process that is time-intensive and subject to inter-operator variability. We developed ADAM, an automated pipeline for digital phenotyping, to quantify tissue and cellular components pertinent to static histomorphometric parameters such as bone and osteoid area, osteoclast and osteoblast count, and bone marrow adipose tissue (BMAT) area. The pipeline allowed rapid generation of delineated tissue and cell maps for up to 20 images in less than a minute. Comparing deep learning-generated annotation pixels with manual annotations, we observed Spearman correlation coefficients of ρ = 0.99 for both mineralized bone and osteoid, and ρ = 0.94 for BMAT. For osteoclast and osteoblast cell counts, which are subject to morphologic heterogeneity, using only brightfield microscopic images and without additional staining, we noted ρ = 0.60 and 0.69, respectively (inter-operator correlation was ρ = 0.62 for osteoclast and 0.84 for osteoblast count). The study also explored the application of morphological texture analysis (MTA), measuring relative pixel patterns that potentially vary with diverse tissue conditions. Notably, MTA from mineralized bone, osteoid, and BMAT showed differentiating potential to identify common pixel characteristics between images labeled as low or high bone turnover based upon the final diagnostic report of the bone biopsy. The Area Under the Receiver Operating Characteristic Curve (AUC-ROC) obtained for BMAT MTA features as a classifier for bone turnover, was 0.87, suggesting that computer-extracted features, not discernable to the human eye, hold potential in classifying tissue states. With additional evaluation, ADAM could be potentially integrated into existing clinical routines to improve pathology workflows and contribute to diagnostic insights into bone biopsy evaluation and reporting.

Indexed as

bone histomorphometrydiseases and disorders of/related to bonedisorders of calcium/phosphate metabolismosteoblastsosteoclasts

Identifiers

PMID40129969
PMCPMC11931614

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.