ArticleJBMR plus2025
ADAM: automated digital phenotyping and morphological texture analysis of bone biopsy images using deep learning.
Article in JBMR plus, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Osteoporosis and CKD-Metabolic Bone Disease Under the Same Umbrella: Insights From a Joint Scientific Symposium.Kidney international reports · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Histomorphometric analysis of undecalcified bone biopsy images provides quantitative assessment of bone turnover, volume, and mineralization using static and dynamic parameters. Traditionally, quantification has relied on manual annotation and tracing of relevant tissue structures, a process that is time-intensive and subject to inter-operator variability. We developed ADAM, an automated pipeline for digital phenotyping, to quantify tissue and cellular components pertinent to static histomorphometric parameters such as bone and osteoid area, osteoclast and osteoblast count, and bone marrow adipose tissue (BMAT) area. The pipeline allowed rapid generation of delineated tissue and cell maps for up to 20 images in less than a minute. Comparing deep learning-generated annotation pixels with manual annotations, we observed Spearman correlation coefficients of ρ = 0.99 for both mineralized bone and osteoid, and ρ = 0.94 for BMAT. For osteoclast and osteoblast cell counts, which are subject to morphologic heterogeneity, using only brightfield microscopic images and without additional staining, we noted ρ = 0.60 and 0.69, respectively (inter-operator correlation was ρ = 0.62 for osteoclast and 0.84 for osteoblast count). The study also explored the application of morphological texture analysis (MTA), measuring relative pixel patterns that potentially vary with diverse tissue conditions. Notably, MTA from mineralized bone, osteoid, and BMAT showed differentiating potential to identify common pixel characteristics between images labeled as low or high bone turnover based upon the final diagnostic report of the bone biopsy. The Area Under the Receiver Operating Characteristic Curve (AUC-ROC) obtained for BMAT MTA features as a classifier for bone turnover, was 0.87, suggesting that computer-extracted features, not discernable to the human eye, hold potential in classifying tissue states. With additional evaluation, ADAM could be potentially integrated into existing clinical routines to improve pathology workflows and contribute to diagnostic insights into bone biopsy evaluation and reporting.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.