Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40129963›Full record

ArticleChild & adolescent social work journal : C & A2025

Resilience in Adolescent Girls in Child Welfare: Reliability and Validity of the RS-14.

Wendy Auslander, Shih-Ying Cheng, Tonya E Edmond

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Child & adolescent social work journal : C & A, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Wendy AuslanderGeorge Warren Brown School of Social Work, Washington University in St. Louis, 1 Brookings Drive, Campus, Box 1196, St. Louis, MO 63130 USA.ORCID 0000-0002-0767-9090
Shih-Ying ChengUniversity of Illinois Chicago, Chicago, USA.
Tonya E EdmondGeorge Warren Brown School of Social Work, Washington University in St. Louis, 1 Brookings Drive, Campus, Box 1196, St. Louis, MO 63130 USA.

Funding

NCIPC CDC HHS R49 CE001510
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Adverse childhood experiences, such as abuse and neglect, have been shown to have longstanding negative consequences on a child's development and outcomes. Studies have noted that there is variation in how youth in child welfare respond to adversity, yet few studies have examined the psychometrics of measures of resilience in this population. In particular, the 14-item Resilience Scale (RS-14) is a widely used instrument yet has not been evaluated for use with adolescents in child welfare populations. The purpose of the study was to describe the levels of resilience reported by adolescent girls involved in the child welfare system and to evaluate the reliability, validity, and factor structure of this scale in this population. Participants were 249 adolescent girls, ages 12-19, who were involved in the child welfare system. Interviews assessed resilience, symptoms of post-traumatic stress, depression, social problem-solving, and demographic variables. Results indicated that levels of resilience among the participants were in the moderate range. The RS-14 demonstrated evidence of good internal consistency and test-retest reliability. Convergent and discriminant validity were established. Confirmatory factor analysis testing a single-factor solution resulted in a weak model fit. A follow-up exploratory factor analysis supported a two-factor solution. Findings suggest this instrument is an appropriate tool for use in child welfare populations.

Indexed as

AdolescentsChild WelfareReliabilityResilienceRS-14Validity

Identifiers

PMID40129963
PMCPMC11929671

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.