Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40129938›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in pharmacology2025

Ethnopharmacological study of traditional medicinal plants used by the people in Metema district, northwestern Ethiopia.

Daniel Tadesse, Ermias Lulekal, Getinet Masresha

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in pharmacology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Daniel TadesseDepartment of Plant Sciences, University of Godar, Gondar, Ethiopia.
Ermias LulekalDepartment of Plant Biology and Biodiversity Management, Addis Ababa University, Addis Ababa, Ethiopia.
Getinet MasreshaDepartment of Biology, University of Godar, Gondar, Ethiopia.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Medicinal plants are used by more than 80% of Ethiopians. The Metema District, shaped by various ethnicities and settlement histories, remains underexplored. This study aimed to document and analyze medicinal plant use and associated traditional knowledge in the local population. Methods: Data were collected through semi-structured interviews, guided field walks, and focus-group discussions. A total of 110 informants participated in the study, using various sampling techniques. The informant consensus factor (ICF) and direct matrix ranking (DMR) were computed along with descriptive statistics to analyze the basic ethnobotanical data. Results: In this study, 85 therapeutic plants were utilized to treat 13 disease categories. The three ethnic groups shared 21.18% of their knowledge of medicinal plants. Fabaceae was the most represented family, comprising 11 plant taxa. Herbs were the predominant plant form (42.4%), leaves being the most frequently used (30.5%). Oral administration was the primary method used for the plant extracts (52.3%). Circulatory and blood-related disorders had the highest ICF value (0.91). Conclusion: This study revealed the rich diversity of medicinal plants and traditional knowledge in the Metema District. The therapeutic potential of the documented plants supports further pharmacological investigations, underscoring the importance of preserving indigenous knowledge and protecting plant resources against ongoing threats.

Indexed as

ailmentsethnobotanyindigenous knowledgemedicinal plantsMetema

Identifiers

PMID40129938
PMCPMC11931033

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.