Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40129905›Full record

ArticlePNAS nexus2025

Disentangling dynamic information and temporal order processing of human action perception.

Vojtěch Smekal, Marta Poyo Solanas, Beatrice de Gelder

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PNAS nexus, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Vojtěch SmekalDepartment of Cognitive Neuroscience, Maastricht University, Oxfordlaan, Maastricht 6229EV, The Netherlands.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5301-1833
Marta Poyo SolanasDepartment of Cognitive Neuroscience, Maastricht University, Oxfordlaan, Maastricht 6229EV, The Netherlands.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6861-9921
Beatrice de GelderDepartment of Cognitive Neuroscience, Maastricht University, Oxfordlaan, Maastricht 6229EV, The Netherlands.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1667-8986

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Human action perception involves processing dynamic information in its temporal order. However, previous studies investigating action perception have not yet distinguished between the presence of dynamic information and the temporal order in which dynamic information unfolds within the context of a single action. Using 3-T functional MRI, we presented participants with brief, single-actor, whole-body actions viewed either as still images, as intact videos, or as videos consisting of short dynamic fragments with the order temporally scrambled. Regions classically associated with action perception showed higher activity for dynamic compared with still stimuli, regardless of the temporal continuity in the dynamic stimuli. However, two clusters in the right inferior parietal lobule (IPL) differentiated between the intact and temporally scrambled videos. Specifically, the right angular gyrus (AG) showed a preference for the intact videos over the temporally scrambled ones, while the right supramarginal gyrus (SMG) showed the opposite pattern. Combined with previous literature, we argue for the role of the IPL as a temporospatial buffer, with the SMG processing dynamic information on short timescales and the AG processing on longer timescales. Our results underscore the need to consider dynamic information and temporal order separately in investigations of action perception.

Identifiers

PMID40129905
PMCPMC11931616

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.