ArticlePNAS nexus2025
Disentangling dynamic information and temporal order processing of human action perception.
Article in PNAS nexus, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Human action perception involves processing dynamic information in its temporal order. However, previous studies investigating action perception have not yet distinguished between the presence of dynamic information and the temporal order in which dynamic information unfolds within the context of a single action. Using 3-T functional MRI, we presented participants with brief, single-actor, whole-body actions viewed either as still images, as intact videos, or as videos consisting of short dynamic fragments with the order temporally scrambled. Regions classically associated with action perception showed higher activity for dynamic compared with still stimuli, regardless of the temporal continuity in the dynamic stimuli. However, two clusters in the right inferior parietal lobule (IPL) differentiated between the intact and temporally scrambled videos. Specifically, the right angular gyrus (AG) showed a preference for the intact videos over the temporally scrambled ones, while the right supramarginal gyrus (SMG) showed the opposite pattern. Combined with previous literature, we argue for the role of the IPL as a temporospatial buffer, with the SMG processing dynamic information on short timescales and the AG processing on longer timescales. Our results underscore the need to consider dynamic information and temporal order separately in investigations of action perception.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.