ArticleRadiology case reports2025
A rare case of MRI-induced thermal burn: Clinical implications and safety awareness.
Article in Radiology case reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) is a widely used, noninvasive diagnostic tool in clinical practice, with millions of scans performed annually. Despite its safety profile, MRI is associated with several potential side effects, including rare but serious complications such as thermal burns. These burns typically result from the interaction of radiofrequency (RF) energy with conductive materials in contact with the skin, or from improper positioning during the scan. This case report details a 76-year-old female who developed a thermal burn on her left elbow after undergoing an MRI of her right shoulder. The patient initially experienced localized heat, redness, and mild tenderness at the site, which later developed into an open wound, leading to a diagnosis of cellulitis. However, further evaluation revealed the wound to be a stage III burn, likely resulting from RF energy exposure during the MRI procedure. The patient had a history of diabetes, a condition that may have contributed to impaired thermoregulation, increasing her risk for thermal injury. The burn was managed with wound debridement, antibiotics, and regular follow-up care, ultimately healing over an 8-week period. This case underscores the importance of understanding the mechanisms of MRI-induced burns, the need for stringent safety protocols, and the role of postprocedure patient education. It also highlights the potential for delayed diagnosis of MRI-related burns, which can be mistaken for other conditions such as cellulitis. Early recognition and appropriate management are critical to preventing complications and ensuring optimal patient outcomes.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.