ArticleFrontiers in cardiovascular medicine2025
Case report and literature review: fetal diagnosis of vascular ring with circumflex right aortic arch and unique aortic arch branching pattern.
Article in Frontiers in cardiovascular medicine, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Identifying Aortic Arch Branching Variations Using Advanced Imaging Techniques.Medicina (Kaunas, Lithuania) · 2025Article
- Tracheal Compression on Chest X-ray Leading to the Diagnosis of Right Aortic Arch in 22q11.2 Deletion Syndrome.Cureus · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Circumflex right aortic arch is a rare aortic arch anomaly where the arch extends in a retro-esophageal pattern with a left-sided descending thoracic aorta. In the setting of circumflex right aortic arch with the ductus arteriosus connecting the left descending aorta and left pulmonary artery, a vascular ring is present and can cause compressive symptoms of the aerodigestive tract. A 33-year-old G4P3 patient underwent fetal echocardiography after obstetric ultrasound showed concern for double aortic arch. Fetal echocardiogram was suspicious for vascular ring with presumptive diagnosis of double aortic arch vs. circumflex right aortic arch. The child was born at 38 weeks gestation via induced vaginal delivery and had an uneventful postnatal course. Post-natal echocardiogram was able to diagnose vascular ring but could not fully assess the arch or branching pattern. Cardiac computed tomography angiography (CCTA) was able to definitively diagnose right aortic arch and characterize the branching pattern. To our knowledge, this is the first case reported in the literature of a circumflex right aortic arch suspected on fetal echocardiogram and postnatal echocardiogram and subsequently confirmed with CCTA. Fetal echocardiogram provides a unique opportunity to assess the aortic arch as the trachea is filled with fluid. However, circumflex aortic arch and double aortic arch can be difficult to delineate on fetal or post-natal echocardiography. CCTA is an effective modality for evaluation of the aortic arch and its branching pattern in the setting of non-diagnostic echocardiography.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.