Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40129767›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in cardiovascular medicine2025

Hotspots and frontiers in patent foramen ovale research: a bibliometric and visualization analysis from 2003 to 2023.

Ying He, Zhaoxia Pu

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in cardiovascular medicine, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Ying HeDepartment of Cardiology, The Second Affiliated Hospital, School of Medicine, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou, China.
Zhaoxia PuDepartment of Cardiology, The Second Affiliated Hospital, School of Medicine, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Patent foramen ovale (PFO) is among the most common congenital heart defects. Over the last two decades, the number of research publications on PFO has increased. This study aims to identify and describe the current state, hotspots, and emerging trends in PFO research over the previous 20 years using bibliometric analysis and visual mapping. Methods: The Web of Science Core Collection was searched for all publications on PFO research, which were then included in the study. CtieSpace, VOSviewer, and Excel software were used to visualize general information, publication output, countries/regions, authors, journals, influential papers, and keyword trends in this field. Results: This comprehensive analysis included 14,495 publications from 6,190 institutions across 115 countries. The United States dominated with the highest number of publications (2,407) and international collaborations. Mas JL made significant contributions to the PFO field, while Meier B emerged as a leading author, publishing 81 articles during the past 20 years. There were strong international collaborations among countries, institutions, and authors. Conclusions: This bibliometric study revealed that recent research frontiers primarily focused on the diagnosis and clinical management of patients with PFO. Future studies are expected to delve deeper into the biological mechanisms by which PFO contributes to stroke, the efficacy and limitations of PFO closure techniques, and the exploration of genetic variations associated with PFO and their roles in disease susceptibility.

Indexed as

bibliometric studyCiteSpacecryptogenic strokeechocardiographypatent foramen ovaleVOSviewer

Identifiers

PMID40129767
PMCPMC11931168

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.