Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40129756›Full record

ReviewGlobal epidemiology2025

An overview of reviews of breastfeeding barriers and facilitators: Analyzing global research trends and hotspots.

Agustín Ramiro Miranda, Paula Eugenia Barral, Ana Veronica Scotta, Mariela Valentina Cortez, Elio Andrés Soria

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Global epidemiology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Observational
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Observational
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Agustín Ramiro MirandaMoISA, University of Montpellier, CIRAD, CIHEAM-IAMM, INRAE, Institut Agro, IRD, 911 Avenue d'Agropolis, Cedex 5, 34394 Montpellier, France.
Paula Eugenia BarralUniversidad Nacional de Córdoba, Facultad de Ciencias Médicas, Bv. de la Reforma, Ciudad Universitaria, 5014 Córdoba, Argentina.
Ana Veronica ScottaUniversidad Nacional de Córdoba, Facultad de Ciencias Médicas, Bv. de la Reforma, Ciudad Universitaria, 5014 Córdoba, Argentina.
Mariela Valentina CortezUniversidad Nacional de Córdoba, Facultad de Ciencias Médicas, Bv. de la Reforma, Ciudad Universitaria, 5014 Córdoba, Argentina.
Elio Andrés SoriaUniversidad Nacional de Córdoba, Facultad de Ciencias Médicas, Bv. de la Reforma, Ciudad Universitaria, 5014 Córdoba, Argentina.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Breastfeeding is the most cost-effective intervention for reducing infant morbidity and mortality, offering benefits for infants and mothers. Despite extensive promotion, global adherence remains below 50 %, resulting in significant clinical, economic, and environmental impacts. Thus, this overview of reviews aims to synthesize barriers and facilitators of breastfeeding, analyze research trends, and identify gaps to guide future research. A comprehensive literature search was conducted, including systematic reviews that examine these factors. The search covered seven electronic data repositories. The methodological quality was assessed using the Risk of Bias in Systematic Reviews tool. Bibliometric analysis focused on identifying top journals, authors, and countries, assessing their impact, and exploring trends over time. Findings were classified and analyzed thematically through line-by-line coding, theme description, and analytical formulation. A total of 123 reviews were included, mostly of high quality and published in top journals. Key trends comprised a growing focus on psychosocial and cultural factors, increased representation from low- and middle-income countries, and improved methodological rigor. However, geographical representation remains biased towards high-income countries, and some breastfeeding outcomes need further exploration. Thematic analysis revealed four categories: Therapeutic and care interventions; Support networks and education; Maternal-infant health issues; and Societal and environmental context. In conclusion, this overview of reviews identifies barriers and facilitators of breastfeeding and emphasizes the need for more inclusive research and tailored support. Addressing gaps in evidence for enhancing healthcare systems and policies can improve breastfeeding practices and outcomes worldwide.

Indexed as

BarriersBibliometricsBreastfeedingFacilitatorsLactationResearch trendsScience mapping

Identifiers

PMID40129756
PMCPMC11931314

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.