Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40129728›Full record

ArticlePhysics and imaging in radiation oncology2025

Deep learning-based prediction of Monte Carlo dose distribution for heavy ion therapy.

Rui He, Hui Zhang, Jian Wang, Guosheng Shen, Ying Luo, Xinyang Zhang, Yuanyuan Ma, Xinguo Liu, Yazhou Li, Haibo Peng and 2 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Physics and imaging in radiation oncology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors.

Rui HeInstitute of Modern Physics, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Lanzhou 730000, China.
Hui ZhangInstitute of Modern Physics, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Lanzhou 730000, China.
Jian WangInstitute of Modern Physics, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Lanzhou 730000, China.
Guosheng ShenInstitute of Modern Physics, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Lanzhou 730000, China.
Ying LuoInstitute of Modern Physics, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Lanzhou 730000, China.
Xinyang ZhangInstitute of Modern Physics, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Lanzhou 730000, China.
Yuanyuan MaInstitute of Modern Physics, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Lanzhou 730000, China.
Xinguo LiuInstitute of Modern Physics, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Lanzhou 730000, China.
Yazhou LiInstitute of Modern Physics, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Lanzhou 730000, China.
Haibo PengSchool of Nuclear Science and Technology, Lanzhou University, Lanzhou 73000,China.
Pengbo HeInstitute of Modern Physics, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Lanzhou 730000, China.
Qiang LiInstitute of Modern Physics, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Lanzhou 730000, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background and purpose: Current methods, like treatment planning system algorithms (TPSDose), lack accuracy, whereas Monte Carlo dose distribution (MCDose) is accurate but computationally intensive. We proposed a deep learning (DL) model for rapid prediction of Monte Carlo simulated dose distribution (MCDose) in heavy ion therapy (HIT). Materials and methods: We developed a DL model - the Cascade Hierarchically Densely 3D U-Net (CHD U-Net) - to predict MCDose using computed tomography images and TPSDose of 67 head-and-neck patients and 30 thorax-and-abdomen patients. We also compared the results with other proton dose DL models and TPSDose. Results: Compared to TPSDose, the gamma passing rate (GPR) improved by 16 % (1 %/1 mm). Notably, the model achieved 99 % and 97 % accuracy under clinically relevant criteria (3 %/3 mm) across the whole dose distribution in patients. For head-and-neck patients, the GPRs of the C3D and HD U-Net models in the PTV region were 97 % and 85 %, and in the body were 98 % and 97 %, respectively. For thorax-and-abdomen patients, the GPR of the C3D and HD U-Net models in the PTV region were 71 % and 51 %, and in the body were 95 % and 90 %, respectively. Conclusions: The proposed CHD U-Net model can predict MCDose in a few seconds and outperforms two alternative DL models. The predicted dose can replace TPSDose in HIT clinical process due to its MC simulation accuracy, thus improving the accuracy of dose calculation and providing a valuable reference for quality assurance.

Indexed as

Analytical algorithmDeep learningDose predictionHeavy ion therapyMonte Carlo simulation

Identifiers

PMID40129728
PMCPMC11929889

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.