ArticlePhysics and imaging in radiation oncology2025
Deep learning-based prediction of Monte Carlo dose distribution for heavy ion therapy.
Article in Physics and imaging in radiation oncology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Transformer-based rapid dose calculation for carbon ion therapy.Medical physics · 2026Article
- An Artificial Intelligence Dose Engine for Fast Carbon Ion Treatment Planning.International journal of particle therapy · 2026Article
- A proof-of-concept study of direct magnetic resonance imaging-based proton dose calculation for brain tumors via neural networks with Monte Carlo-comparable accuracy.Physics and imaging in radiation oncology · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
12 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background and purpose: Current methods, like treatment planning system algorithms (TPSDose), lack accuracy, whereas Monte Carlo dose distribution (MCDose) is accurate but computationally intensive. We proposed a deep learning (DL) model for rapid prediction of Monte Carlo simulated dose distribution (MCDose) in heavy ion therapy (HIT). Materials and methods: We developed a DL model - the Cascade Hierarchically Densely 3D U-Net (CHD U-Net) - to predict MCDose using computed tomography images and TPSDose of 67 head-and-neck patients and 30 thorax-and-abdomen patients. We also compared the results with other proton dose DL models and TPSDose. Results: Compared to TPSDose, the gamma passing rate (GPR) improved by 16 % (1 %/1 mm). Notably, the model achieved 99 % and 97 % accuracy under clinically relevant criteria (3 %/3 mm) across the whole dose distribution in patients. For head-and-neck patients, the GPRs of the C3D and HD U-Net models in the PTV region were 97 % and 85 %, and in the body were 98 % and 97 %, respectively. For thorax-and-abdomen patients, the GPR of the C3D and HD U-Net models in the PTV region were 71 % and 51 %, and in the body were 95 % and 90 %, respectively. Conclusions: The proposed CHD U-Net model can predict MCDose in a few seconds and outperforms two alternative DL models. The predicted dose can replace TPSDose in HIT clinical process due to its MC simulation accuracy, thus improving the accuracy of dose calculation and providing a valuable reference for quality assurance.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.