ArticleClinical psychology : a publication of the Division of Clinical Psychology of the American Psychological Association2024
Patient and provider attitudes toward video and phone telemental health care during the COVID-19 pandemic: a systematic review.
Article in Clinical psychology : a publication of the Division of Clinical Psychology of the American Psychological Association, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
10 citing papers in PubMed.
- Telehealth Use and Satisfaction in Primary and Mental Health Care Across 9 High-Income Countries.Mayo Clinic proceedings. Digital health · 2026Article
- Comparative Outcomes of Video, Phone, and In-Person Mental Health Care.JAMA network open · 2026Article
- A Roadmap for Implementing Virtual Geriatric Mental Health Services for Rural Veterans: Qualitative Longitudinal Evaluation.JMIR aging · 2026Article
- Provider and leadership attitudes toward telemental health at sites with high levels of video, phone, and in-person care: A qualitative analysis.Psychological services · 2026Article
- Enhancing comprehensive in primary care: results of a cross-sectional survey of primary care social workers in Ontario, Canada.BMC primary care · 2026Article
- Patient Perspectives on AI- and XR-Enabled Telemedicine: A Cross-Sectional Survey in Romania.Healthcare (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
- Site-Level Differences in the Provision of Telemental Health Care Within the Department of Veterans Affairs.Health services research · 2025Observational
- User-Driven Development of a Digital Behavioral Intervention for Chronic Pain: Multimethod Multiphase Study.JMIR formative research · 2025Article
- Telehealth Modality Preferences for Video and Voice-Only Visits Among US Clinicians and the Public: Cross-Sectional, Web-Based Survey Study.Journal of medical Internet research · 2025Article
- Phone-only mental health care within the Department of Veterans Affairs: Associations with rurality, age, sex, and clinical severity.The Journal of rural health : official journal of the American Rural Health Association and the National Rural Health Care Association · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Objective: This review synthesizes findings from studies reporting on patient and provider attitudes toward telemental health care conducted via both video and phone. It is informed by the Technology Acceptance Model, in that it reports on patient and provider ratings of the effectiveness of video and phone care, ease of use, overall satisfaction with the modalities, and future modality preference. Methods: A systematic review was conducted of the English-language, peer-reviewed literature published between 2013 and 2023 within PubMed, Embase, ProQuest Psychology Database, and PsycInfo. 181 studies met full-text review criteria and 24 studies were ultimately included. Results: Findings were mixed, such that some studies reported similar attitudes toward video and phone care, some favored video care, and relatively few studies favored phone. When considering provider and patient findings separately, providers more strongly favored video over phone with regard to effectiveness, overall satisfaction, and preference for future use. Studies of patients varied between favoring video and reporting nonsignificant differences between the two modalities. Patients tended to prefer the modality they were currently using. Both patients and providers rated video as more complex than phone in several studies. Discussion: Providers rated video more positively than phone across the majority of included domains, while patient attitudes were more variable. Findings must be interpreted with caution as there is a risk of selection bias across all studies. Future reviews of qualitative studies will be important to provide a more nuanced understanding of patient and provider attitudes toward video and phone telemental health care.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.