ArticleJournal of diabetes and metabolic disorders2025
The discriminatory ability of wrist and neck circumference in predicting insulin resistance in overweight and obese children.
Article in Journal of diabetes and metabolic disorders, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objectives: The aim of this study was to investigate the association of wrist circumference (WrC) and neck circumferences (NC) with Insulin Resistance (IR) in obese and overweight children and adolescents. Methods: This cross-sectional study included 227 overweight and obese children. Anthropometric indices such as NC and WrC were measured. Laboratory parameters such as fasting blood glucose (FBS) and insulin were measured after 12 h of overnight fasting. IR was determined by Homeostatic Model Assessment for Insulin Resistance (HOMA-IR) using formula and HOMA-IR ≥ 2.6 defined as IR. The predictive power of NC and WrC for IR was assessed using receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analyses and the area under ROC curve (AUC) > 0.65 were considered as highly accurate tests. Results: Among the 227 included samples, 52.4% were girls, and 67.4% were classified as obese. IR was detected in 48.5% of the participants without a significant association with gender (48.8% in girls and 48.1% in boys) and weight status (43.2% in overweight and 51% in obese). The AUCs of WrC and NC in detecting IR were 0.78 (95% CI: 0.72-0.84) and 0.72 (95% CI: 0.65-0.78) in overweight and obese children respectively. The Chi-square test shows that the AUC of WrC in predicting IR was statistically higher than NC (Chi-square: 4.47, P: 0.03). Conclusions: Our findings showed that WrC and NC are two useful indices for predicting IR in overweight and obese children and adolescents. Therefore they could be used as a clinical indicators of IR in children and adolescents.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.