ArticleJournal of diabetes and metabolic disorders2025
Predicting COVID-19 progression in hospitalized patients in Kurdistan Province using a multi-state model.
Article in Journal of diabetes and metabolic disorders, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objectives: This study aimed to implement a multi-state risk prediction model to predict the progression of COVID-19 cases among hospitalized patients in Kurdistan province by analyzing hospital care data. Methods: This retrospective analysis consisted of data from 17,286 patients admitted to hospitals with COVID-19 from March 23, 2019, to December 19, 2021, in various areas in the Kurdistan province. A multi-state prediction model was used to show that each transition is predicted by a different set of variables. These variables include underlying diseases (like diabetes, hypertension, etc.) and sociodemographic information (like sex and age). Model aims to predict the likelihood of recovery, the need for critical care intervention (e.g., transfer to isolation units or the ICU), or exits from the hospitalization course. We performed the statistical analysis using R software and the mstate package. Results: Of the hospitalized patients studied, 5.6% died of the disease, 6.6% were admitted to ICUs, and 38.72% were treated in isolation units. Mortality rates in general wards, isolation units, and the ICU were 3.48%, 4.56%, and 26.6%, respectively. Significant predictors for ICU admission include age over 60 years (HR: 1.46, 95% CI 1.37-1.55), kidney-related conditions (HR: 2.19, 95% CI 1.65-2.91), cardiovascular diseases (HR: 1.68, 95% CI 1.46-1.94), lung disease (HR: 1.89,95% CI 1.43-2.05), and cancer (HR: 2.46,95% CI 1.77-3.41). The likelihood of in-hospital death is significantly increased by age over 60 years (HR: 2.40, 95% CI 2.09-2.76), diabetes (HR: 1.97, 95% CI 1.45-2.68), high blood pressure (HR: 2.30, 95% CI 1.78-2.97), and history of heart disease (HR: 3.01, 95% CI 2.29-3.95). Conclusion: The model helps the provider and policymakers to make an informed decision depending on patient management and resource allocation within the health care systems.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.