Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40129631›Full record

ArticleJournal of clinical and experimental hepatology

Predictors of Non-response to Atezolizumab Plus Bevacizumab in Patients With Unresectable Hepatocellular Carcinoma: A Multicentre Real World Study (HCC-AB Study).

Satender P Singh, Karan Kumar, Anand Kulkarni, Vinod Arora, Ashok Choudhury, Alisha Chaubal, Sahaj Rathi, Samir Shah, Sunil Taneja, Ashish Kumar and 5 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of clinical and experimental hepatology. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

15 authors.

Satender P SinghDepartment of Hepatology, Institute of Liver and Biliary Sciences, Vasant Kunj, New Delhi, India.
Karan KumarDepartment of Hepatology and Liver Transplant, Mahatma Gandhi Hospital, Jaipur, India.
Anand KulkarniDepartment of Hepatology and Liver Transplant, Asian Institute of Gastroenterology, Hyderabad, India.
Vinod AroraDepartment of Hepatology, Institute of Liver and Biliary Sciences, Vasant Kunj, New Delhi, India.
Ashok ChoudhuryDepartment of Hepatology, Institute of Liver and Biliary Sciences, Vasant Kunj, New Delhi, India.
Alisha ChaubalDepartment of Hepatology and Liver Intensive Care, Global Hospitals, Mumbai, India.
Sahaj RathiDepartment of Hepatology, Post Graduate Institute of Medical Education and Research, Chandigarh, India.
Samir ShahDepartment of Hepatology and Liver Intensive Care, Global Hospitals, Mumbai, India.
Sunil TanejaDepartment of Hepatology, Post Graduate Institute of Medical Education and Research, Chandigarh, India.
Ashish KumarDepartment of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Sir Ganga Ram Hospital, New Delhi, India.
Ajay DusejaDepartment of Hepatology, Post Graduate Institute of Medical Education and Research, Chandigarh, India.
Guresh KumarDepartment of Hepatology, Institute of Liver and Biliary Sciences, Vasant Kunj, New Delhi, India.
P Nagaraja RaoDepartment of Hepatology and Liver Transplant, Asian Institute of Gastroenterology, Hyderabad, India.
Vivek SaraswatDepartment of Hepatology and Liver Transplant, Mahatma Gandhi Hospital, Jaipur, India.
Shiv K SarinDepartment of Hepatology, Institute of Liver and Biliary Sciences, Vasant Kunj, New Delhi, India.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: The approved immunotherapies for patients with advanced HCC are Atezolizumab and Bevacizumab. However, patients in India present late and healthcare is often available through self-financing. To rationalise the therapy, we conducted a large multicentre study to identify the baseline predictors of non-response to atezolizumab and bevacizumab in advanced unresectable HCC. Methods: A dose of atezolizumab 1200 mg and bevacizumab 15 mg/kg was used every 3 weeks from 6 centres across India. A total of 278 patients were screened, and 160 were included in the study. The study included patients with locally advanced metastatic or inoperable hepatocellular carcinoma who were at least 18 years of age and those who received <3 injections were excluded. Fifty-four percent of the included patients were BCLC-B and 46% were BCLC-C. The primary objective was to study overall survival and progression-free survival. While identifying radiological response, objective response rate and adverse effects were secondary objectives. Results: The mean age was 61.9 ± 11.7 years, 88% were male, 55% had NASH, 16.3% had hepatitis C, 18.8% had hepatitis B and the rest were alcohol. The mean Model for End-Stage Liver Disease (MELD) is 12.05 ± 4.46, Albumin-Bilirubin Score (ALBI) is -2.04 ± 0.57. Fifty-five percent received first-line and 45% as second/other line therapy. The median overall survival was 10 (95% confidence interval [CI]: 6.1-15.6) months. Progression-free survival was found to be 8 (95%CI: 5.1-14.7) months overall. Eleven (6.9%) achieved complete response, 28 (17.5%) partial response, 33 (20.6%) had stable disease and 88 (55%) had progressive disease. On multivariate analysis, CRP>1 mg/dl ( Conclusion: Non-response to atezolizumab and bevacizumab immunotherapy was predicted by CRP>1 mg/dl, PIVKA-II>400mAU/ml, AFP>100 ng/ml and the presence of diabetes.

Indexed as

ALBI scoreDiabetesHCCImmune checkpoint inhibitorsPIVKA-II

Identifiers

PMID40129631
PMCPMC11930068

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.