Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40129628›Full record

ArticlePlastic and reconstructive surgery. Global open2025

Anatomical Landmark-guided Strategy for Computer-assisted Reconstruction of Infrastructure Maxillary Defects Using Free Fibula Flap.

Songying Wu, Jingya Jane Pu, Edmond Ho Nang Pow, Pui Hang Leung, Xing-Na Yu, Yu-Xiong Su, Wei-Fa Yang

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Plastic and reconstructive surgery. Global open, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Songying WuFrom the Division of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Faculty of Dentistry, The University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong Special Administrative Region, China.
Jingya Jane PuFrom the Division of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Faculty of Dentistry, The University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong Special Administrative Region, China.
Edmond Ho Nang PowDivision of Restorative Dental Sciences, Faculty of Dentistry, The University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong Special Administrative Region, China.
Pui Hang LeungFrom the Division of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Faculty of Dentistry, The University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong Special Administrative Region, China.
Xing-Na YuFrom the Division of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Faculty of Dentistry, The University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong Special Administrative Region, China.
Yu-Xiong SuFrom the Division of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Faculty of Dentistry, The University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong Special Administrative Region, China.
Wei-Fa YangFrom the Division of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Faculty of Dentistry, The University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong Special Administrative Region, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Computer-assisted surgery in head and neck reconstruction yields predictable and favorable clinical outcomes. However, there is a lack in the optimal arrangement of the fibula bone segments to re-establish the function and aesthetics of the maxilla. Methods: This study proposed a novel anatomical landmark-guided strategy for the virtual surgical planning (VSP) of infrastructure maxilla reconstruction using a free fibula flap. The optimal positioning of fibula segments was validated with a retrospective clinical study. Patients who underwent computer-assisted infrastructure maxillectomy and reconstruction with a free fibula flap from May 2017 to April 2024 were reviewed. Reproducibility of the landmarks and associated clinical parameters was assessed in VSP compared with the preoperative maxilla. Additionally, a structured quantitative approach was adopted for postoperative surgical outcome analysis by comparison of the postoperative maxilla and the VSP. Results: Twenty patients fulfilled the criteria of this study. In 11 cases, we conformed to the proposed reconstruction strategy (group A). In 9 cases, we adopted a modified approach (group B) with deviations in the count of fibula segments and positioning strategy. In group A, the pooled median landmark error was 2.19 mm (interquartile range, 1.63-2.91 mm) in the VSP compared with the preoperative maxilla; in group B, the error was 4.54 mm (interquartile range, 2.05-6.15 mm). The clinical parameters demonstrated satisfactory recapture of the alveolar arch and maxillary width. Conclusions: This anatomical landmark-guided strategy was validated with satisfactory reproducibility of the quantitative metrics in the VSP. The anatomical landmarks and associated clinical parameters provided a structured quantitative approach for postoperative analysis of computer-assisted maxillary reconstruction using FFFs.

Identifiers

PMID40129628
PMCPMC11932600

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.