ArticleFrontiers in public health2025
Living arrangements, health outcomes, and the buffering role of social capital among older adults in China.
Article in Frontiers in public health, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed.
- Multiple chronic conditions and intrinsic capacity among middle-aged and older adults: Evidence from CHARLS.Medicine · 2026Article
- Article
- Social and community determinants of living arrangements among older adults: the role of social support and mental health promotion.BMC geriatrics · 2026Article
- Financial decision-making power and mental well-being in older adults: a nationwide longitudinal cohort study in China.BMC geriatrics · 2026Article
- Exploring Older Adults' Interest in Virtual Volunteering: Evidence from a Multi-Theoretical Model Combining TAM, Self-Efficacy, and Digital Divide Perspectives.Behavioral sciences (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Currently, about 40 million older people in China live alone or in nursing homes, and this number is expected to continue increasing. It is important to examine the effects of living arrangements on older people's health status and determine whether different types of social capital help buffer the health effects of living alone or in nursing homes. Method: We used data from the CLHLS survey (2017-2018), which included 9,669 older adults. Among them, 1,542 lived alone, 312 lived in nursing homes, and 7,815 lived with their family. We used linear regression to examine the relationship between living arrangements, health outcomes, and social capital. Results: Living alone leads to higher levels of depression in older adults, with a coefficient of 1.63 for the depression value for older adults, and living alone reduces older adults' self-rated health scores, with a coefficient of -0.12 on the self-rated health scores for older adults. Living in nursing homes also has a significant effect on the mental health of older adults, with a coefficient of 1.31 for the depression value for older adults. At the same time, we find that different categories of social capital buffer the impact of living alone and living in nursing homes on health. We find that visits from children helped mitigate the increase in depression associated with living in nursing homes and the decrease in self-rated health associated with living alone. At the same time, social interactions at the community level help mitigate the increase in depression values and the reduction of self-rated health scores associated with living alone. Conclusion: Different categories of social capital buffer the health of older people living alone and in nursing homes differently, so targeted enhancement of social capital based on older adults' living arrangements is essential to improve their health.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.