ArticleInternational journal of women's health2025
A Cross-Sectional Analysis of Maternal Cardiac Autonomic Function in Kazakh Pregnant Women with Gestational Diabetes.
Article in International journal of women's health, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: Gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM) is a common complication during pregnancy that poses considerable risks to both maternal and fetal health. However, its effect on cardiac autonomic function, measured by heart rate variability (HRV), remains uncertain. This study aims to investigate potential alterations in cardiac autonomic function in women diagnosed with GDM. Methods: In this cross-sectional study, 80 Kazakh pregnant women in their third trimester with GDM were enrolled from the endocrinology department of Aktobe Medical Center between January and April 2023. A control group of 30 third-trimester pregnant women without GDM was also selected from outpatient clinics in Aktobe City. HRV was measured with participants in a seated position. A nomogram was developed to predict GDM risk, integrating relevant parameters associated with the condition. Results: Women with GDM were found to be older than those in the control group (p=0.005), though there were no significant differences in education level, employment status, or parity between the two groups. GDM was associated with larger fetal size (p=0.035) and a higher incidence of miscarriages and abortions (p<0.05) compared to the control group. Additionally, obesity was more prevalent among women with GDM (p<0.05). HRV parameters showed no significant differences between the GDM group and healthy pregnant women. The nomogram demonstrated good predictive accuracy, with an area under the curve of 0.7847 in the training cohort. Conclusion: The nomogram developed in this study may prove useful for clinicians and patients in making informed clinical decisions and assessing outcomes. Notably, no significant differences in HRV were observed between women with uncomplicated pregnancies and those with GDM.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.