ArticleERJ open research2025
Cough in pulmonary rehabilitation: a retrospective analysis of responders and nonresponders.
Article in ERJ open research, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Pulmonary rehabilitation (PR) is essential for people with chronic respiratory diseases (CRDs), yet its impact on cough-related quality of life (CR-QoL) remains unexplored. We assessed the effects of PR on CR-QoL, described the characteristics of responders and nonresponders to PR, and explored determinants of responsiveness in this health domain in individuals with CRDs. Methods: A retrospective study was conducted. We assessed CR-QoL using the Leicester Cough Questionnaire (LCQ) and the impact of the disease with the COPD Assessment Test (CAT), before and after PR. Cut-offs of <17.05 in LCQ total score and ≥10 in CAT were used to detect low CR-QoL and medium impact of the disease. Responders were defined as achieving a minimal clinically important difference (MCID) of ≥1.3 on the LCQ total score. Pre- Results: 135 participants with CRDs (39% females; age 68±10 years; 61% COPD; forced expiratory volume in 1 s (FEV Conclusion: PR enhances CR-QoL. Identification of CR-QoL and disease impact traits at baseline offers insights to optimise this outcome responsiveness to PR.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.