ArticleOpen medicine (Warsaw, Poland)2025
Unveiling the role of CXCL10 in pancreatic cancer progression: A novel prognostic indicator.
Article in Open medicine (Warsaw, Poland), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- CXCL10 as a migration-associated biomarker in oral squamous cell carcinoma.BMC oral health · 2026Article
- CXCL10/CXCR3 axis facilitates the M2 polarization of macrophages in colorectal cancer via activating RAF.Discover oncology · 2025Article
- Integrative Spatial Omics for Systems-Level Mapping of Pathological Niches.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objective: Pancreatic cancer is distinguished by its high likelihood of metastasis and drug resistance, while the fundamental mechanisms are inadequately elucidated. This study aimed to identify pivotal hub genes associated with pancreatic cancer and assess their potential utility in predicting its onset and progression. Methods: Weighted gene co-expression network analysis (WGCNA) combined with differential expression analysis identified novel susceptibility modules and hub genes for pancreatic cancer. Kyoto Encyclopedia of Genes and Genomes and gene ontology analyses were utilized to explore the potential roles of these hub genes. Receiver operator characteristic curves and nomogram models were developed to evaluate diagnostic efficacy. Mendelian randomization, flow cytometry, Transwell, and RNA sequencing were conducted to explore the association between C-X-C motif chemokine ligand 10 (CXCL10) and immune infiltration. Results: WGCNA analysis was performed to build gene co-expression networks, and ten key genes were found. CXCL10 was the central gene, and its expression was significantly linked to the survival of patients with pancreatic cancer and their response to immune checkpoint inhibitors. CXCL10 demonstrated the ability to stimulate the differentiation of macrophages toward the M2 phenotype. CXCL10 could facilitate the metastasis of pancreatic cancer cells by modulating macrophage polarization. CXCL10 affects macrophage polarization by regulating the expression of vascular endothelial growth factor A. Conclusions: CXCL10 demonstrates potential as a therapeutic target for managing pancreatic cancer.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.