SynthesisFrontiers in psychology2025
How do voice acoustics affect the perceived trustworthiness of a speaker? A systematic review.
Synthesis in Frontiers in psychology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Human voices communicating trustworthy intent: A demographically diverse speech audio dataset.Scientific data · 2025Article
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Trust is a multidimensional and dynamic social and cognitive construct, considered the glue of society. Gauging someone's perceived trustworthiness is essential for forming and maintaining healthy relationships across various domains. Humans have become adept at inferring such traits from speech for survival and sustainability. This skill has extended to the technological space, giving rise to humanlike voice technologies. The inclination to assign personality traits to these technologies suggests that machines may be processed along similar social and vocal dimensions as human voices. Given the increasing prevalence of voice technology in everyday tasks, this systematic review examines the factors in the psychology of voice acoustics that influence listeners' trustworthiness perception of speakers, be they human or machine. Overall, this systematic review has revealed that voice acoustics impact perceptions of trustworthiness in both humans and machines. Specifically, combining multiple acoustic features through multivariate methods enhances interpretability and yields more balanced findings compared to univariate approaches. Focusing solely on isolated features like pitch often yields inconclusive results when viewed collectively across studies without considering other factors. Crucially, situational, or contextual factors should be utilised for enhanced interpretation as they tend to offer more balanced findings across studies. Moreover, this review has highlighted the significance of cross-examining speaker-listener demographic diversity, such as ethnicity and age groups; yet, the scarcity of such efforts accentuates the need for increased attention in this area. Lastly, future work should involve listeners' own trust predispositions and personality traits with ratings of trustworthiness perceptions.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.