ArticleOpen life sciences2025
Effects of
Article in Open life sciences, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Review Article: Biomarkers in Liver Transplantation for Hepatocellular Carcinoma: Towards Precision Medicine.Alimentary pharmacology & therapeutics · 2026Review
- Immunopathogenesis of antibody-mediated rejection in liver transplantation.Frontiers in immunology · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
This study investigates the role of donor-specific antibodies (DSAs) in liver transplantation outcomes, focusing on their effects on liver damage. Ninety-four patients who underwent liver transplantation between 2019 and 2024 at Atatürk University were included. DSA testing was performed using the Luminex QIAGEN LifeCodes method. Patient demographic data, laboratory results, clinical conditions, and biopsy findings were analyzed. Disease-specific analyses were conducted for Wilson's disease, autoimmune hepatitis, hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC), and hepatitis B virus (HBV). Due to the limited sample size, larger validation studies are needed, and the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on the data collection process was considered. At the end of 1 year, persistent DSA had no significant effect on liver damage. However, early DSA positivity, particularly persistence and titration, requires further investigation. In Wilson's disease, two DSA-positive patients (mean fluorescence intensity [MFI] 1,000-1,500) showed no damage. Among autoimmune hepatitis patients, 5 of 19 were DSA positive (MFI 1,700-5,600), with no detected damage. Four HCC patients were DSA positive (MFI 1,300-2,200). Among HBV patients, 12 of 31 were DSA positive, and 5 experienced liver damage. Tacrolimus levels in the third month were statistically associated with bilirubin levels. Prospective studies are needed to further clarify the clinical significance of DSA.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.