Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40129448›Full record

ArticleEuropean journal of obstetrics & gynecology and reproductive biology: X2025

Added value of radiological staging to clinical examination in different histopathological subtypes of uterine cervical cancer: A retrospective study.

Carla Linn Stadler, Sara N Strandberg

Registry-linked trialAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in European journal of obstetrics & gynecology and reproductive biology: X, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT05855941 (Prognostic and Diagnostic Added Value of Medical Imaging in Staging and Treatment Planning of Gynecological Cancer), which is not on this map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT05855941 recruitingnot on this map

Prognostic and Diagnostic Added Value of Medical Imaging in Staging and Treatment Planning of Gynecological Cancer (PRODIGYN)

TypeobservationalSponsorRegion VästerbottenRan2023 to 2032Enrolled120ConditionsCervix Cancer, Endometrial Cancer, Epithelial Ovarian CancerArmsFDG-PET/CT and FDG-PET/MRI
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Carla Linn StadlerHospital of Sundsvall, Sundsvall, Sweden.
Sara N StrandbergUniversity Hospital of Umeå, Department of Diagnostics and Intervention, Umeå University, Umeå, Sweden.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Objective: Accurate staging of uterine cervical cancer (UCC) is crucial for treatment guidance and prognostic predictions. This study investigated the added value of conventional diagnostic imaging for different histopathological subtypes of UCC by comparing clinical staging according to International Federation of Gynaecology and Obstetrics staging system (cFIGO) and radiological staging (rFIGO) with histopathological staging (pFIGO) as reference. Methods: 26 consecutive patients with UCC from the retrospective part of the PRODIGYN study (ethical approval number 2022-04207-01; NCT05855941) were included in the present study. Data from study participants was collected from radiological and histopathological records 2016-2022 at the University hospital of Umeå. Staging was assessed according to the FIGO 2018 staging system. Statistical analysis included descriptive statistics and Cohen's weighted kappa coefficient (κ) for calculation of agreement between cFIGO and rFIGO, and between rFIGO and pFIGO. Results: With rFIGO staging, more advanced disease stages were found in 67 % (8/12 patients with known cFIGO). Poor agreement was found between cFIGO and rFIGO (κ =0.057) and between rFIGO and pFIGO (κ= 0169). Among the patients with squamous cell carcinoma (SCC) positive for human papilloma virus (HPV+), 67 % (4/6) were assigned a higher stage by rFIGO compared to cFIGO. For the single patients with HPV-negative SCC and HPV status unknown SCC, both were upstaged by rFIGO. In the case of adenocarcinomas, 67 % (2/3) of the patients were assigned a higher stage with rFIGO. Conclusions: In primary staging of UCC, rFIGO leads to substantial up-staging compared to cFIGO, without obvious differences in subtypes.

Indexed as

AdenocarcinomaComputed TomographyMagnetic Resonance ImagingPositron Emission Tomography Computed TomographySquamous Cell NeoplasmsUterine cervical neoplasms

Identifiers

PMID40129448
PMCPMC11930720

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.