ArticleEuropean journal of obstetrics & gynecology and reproductive biology: X2025
Impact of physician, family and society on the choice of Cesarean-section delivery mode among Lebanese females.
Article in European journal of obstetrics & gynecology and reproductive biology: X, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Prevalence, indications, and preference of caesarean section deliveries among women attending primary health care units in Port-Said City, Egypt.The Journal of the Egyptian Public Health Association · 2026Article
- Attitude and subjective norms as predictors of intention of married men and women to accept caesarean section delivery in Lagos, Nigeria.Reproductive health · 2026Article
- Investigating the effect of an educational intervention based on the theory of planned behavior on the choice of delivery method among primiparous women.BMC pregnancy and childbirth · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: The increasing rate of cesarean section (C-section) deliveries has become a global concern, prompting intervention from governments and healthcare organizations, including the World Health Organization (WHO), which is actively working to reduce the number of unnecessary C-sections worldwide. This study examines the role of physicians, family, and societal factors on C-section decision-making among Lebanese women. Methods: This cross-sectional study included 367 Lebanese women recruited between March and September 2024. The Attitude Toward Birth Selection Method was used to determine factors influencing birth method preference. The scale evaluates eight factors: beliefs and attitudes, sexual and physical attitudes, fear of childbirth, preference of convenience, health and support, sociocultural norms, confidence in the birth practitioners, personal and practical choice, and sources of motivation. Results: Findings suggest that sources of motivation and confidence in birth practitioner were associated with a higher preference for C-section delivery. In contrast, beliefs and attitudes and personal and practical choices were more strongly associated with a preference for vaginal delivery. Conclusion: This study highlights the significant role of physicians, family, and societal influences play in shaping C-section decision-making. These findings serve as a first step for developing awareness campaigns aimed at reducing unnecessary C-sections and supporting women to make informed and health-conscious decisions about childbirth.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.