Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40129446›Full record

ArticleResearch in diagnostic and interventional imaging2025

Comparing active teaching to hybrid lecture-based method for learning radiology basics: A single center controlled study.

Fabien de Oliveira, Jean-Paul Beregi, Hugo Potier, Thorgal Brun, Chris Serrand, Julien Frandon

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Research in diagnostic and interventional imaging, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Fabien de OliveiraDepartment of Medical Imaging, Plateforme de recherche en imagerie médicale (PRIM), centre hospitalier universitaire de Nîmes, université de Montpellier, Medical Imaging Group Nîmes, Imagine, 30029, Nîmes, France.
Jean-Paul BeregiDepartment of Medical Imaging, Plateforme de recherche en imagerie médicale (PRIM), centre hospitalier universitaire de Nîmes, université de Montpellier, Medical Imaging Group Nîmes, Imagine, 30029, Nîmes, France.
Hugo PotierDepartment of Biostatistics, Clinical Epidemiology, Public Health, and Innovation in Methodology (BESPIM), centre hospitalier universitaire de Nîmes, 30029, Nîmes, France.
Thorgal BrunDepartment of Medical Imaging, Plateforme de recherche en imagerie médicale (PRIM), centre hospitalier universitaire de Nîmes, université de Montpellier, Medical Imaging Group Nîmes, Imagine, 30029, Nîmes, France.
Chris SerrandDepartment of Biostatistics, Clinical Epidemiology, Public Health, and Innovation in Methodology (BESPIM), centre hospitalier universitaire de Nîmes, 30029, Nîmes, France.
Julien FrandonDepartment of Medical Imaging, Plateforme de recherche en imagerie médicale (PRIM), centre hospitalier universitaire de Nîmes, université de Montpellier, Medical Imaging Group Nîmes, Imagine, 30029, Nîmes, France.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Objective: There is a lack of knowledge about radiology among medical students at the start of their curriculum. The optimal teaching method for radiological basics remains uncertain. We conducted a controlled trial to compare the effectiveness of full active learning and hybrid lecture-based teaching methods. Methods: All second-year medical students at Nîmes University Hospital (Nîmes, France) were invited to participate in a training session in the radiology unit. Volunteers were divided into hybrid lecture-based and full active learning groups. The hybrid lecture-based group received a lecture-based session followed by a unit visit, while the full active learning group utilized a structured form with progressive objectives during the visit. Pretests, immediate post-tests, and two-week follow-up tests were conducted. Short-term progression was the primary outcome, with secondary objectives including mid-term acquisition and associated factors. Results: 51 students participated, with 20 in the hybrid lecture-based group and 31 in the full active learning group. Both groups exhibited significant progression between the first and second tests (+8.48 and +2.52 respectively, Conclusion: The hybrid pedagogical method yielded superior results in teaching second-year medical students the basics of radiology compared to the full active learning teaching method.

Indexed as

Active learningControlled trialLecture-based teachingMedical educationRadiology

Identifiers

PMID40129446
PMCPMC11930576

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.