Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40129389›Full record

ArticleTrends in hearing

Validation of a Self-Fitting Over-the-Counter Hearing Aid Intervention Compared with a Clinician-Fitted Hearing Aid Intervention: A Within-Subjects Crossover Design Using the Same Device.

Lucas S Baltzell, Kosta Kokkinakis, Amy Li, Anusha Yellamsetty, Katherine Teece, Peggy B Nelson

Abstract readComparative StudyValidation Study
In one paragraph

Article in Trends in hearing. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Lucas S BaltzellConcha Labs, San Mateo, CA, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-7082-9960
Kosta KokkinakisConcha Labs, San Mateo, CA, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-2081-1495
Amy LiConcha Labs, San Mateo, CA, USA.ORCID 0009-0005-6258-8991
Anusha YellamsettyDepartment of Audiology, San Jose State University, San Jose, CA, USA.
Katherine TeeceDepartment of Speech-Language-Hearing Sciences, University of Minnesota-Twin Cities, Minneapolis, MN, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-7273-0737
Peggy B NelsonDepartment of Speech-Language-Hearing Sciences, University of Minnesota-Twin Cities, Minneapolis, MN, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In October of 2022, the US Food and Drug Administration finalized regulations establishing the category of self-fitting over-the-counter (OTC) hearing aids, intended to reduce barriers to hearing aid adoption for individuals with self-perceived mild to moderate hearing loss. Since then a number of self-fitting OTC hearing aids have entered the market, and a small number of published studies have demonstrated the effectiveness of a self-fitted OTC intervention against a traditional clinician-fitted intervention. Given the variety of self-fitting approaches available, and the small number of studies demonstrating effectiveness, the goal of the present study was to evaluate the effectiveness of a commercially available self-fitting OTC hearing aid intervention against a clinician-fitted intervention. Consistent with previous studies, we found that the self-fitted intervention was not inferior to the clinician-fitted intervention for self-reported benefit and objective speech-in-noise outcomes. We found statistically significant improvements in self-fitted outcomes compared to clinician-fitted outcomes, though deviations from best audiological practices in our clinician-fitted intervention may have influenced our results. In addition to presenting our results, we discuss the state of evaluating the noninferiority of self-fitted interventions and offer some new perspectives.

Indexed as

Correction of Hearing ImpairmentHearing AidsHearing LossPersons with Hearing DisabilitiesSelf CareAdultAgedCross-Over StudiesFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedNoiseSpeech PerceptionTreatment Outcomehearing aid benefithearing aidsover-the-counter hearing aidsself-fitting hearing aids

Identifiers

PMID40129389
PMCPMC11938855

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.