SynthesisInternational wound journal2025
Direct Sampling Mass Spectrometry Analysis for the Assessment of Wounds: A Systematic Review.
Synthesis in International wound journal, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Mass spectrometry is increasingly utilised in medicine to identify and quantify small biomarkers for diagnostic and prognostic purposes. Conventional mass spectrometry, however, requires time-consuming sample preparation, hindering its clinical application. Direct sampling mass spectrometry, which allows for direct analysis of patient samples with minimal preparation, offers potential for clinical use. This systematic review examines the utility of direct sampling mass spectrometry for the assessment of external wounds and explores its translational applications in wound care. Out of 2 930 screened abstracts, six studies were included employing various direct sampling mass spectrometry technologies. These studies focused on burn wounds (n = 3), pressure ulcers (n = 2), and acute surgical wounds (n = 1). Both targeted and untargeted molecular profiling methods were used to examine biomarkers related to inflammatory and healing processes, including various proteins, lipid species, and other metabolites. Direct sampling mass spectrometry was found to complement conventional methods such as histology, providing additional insights into the spatial localisation and accumulation of metabolites within wounds. Additionally, imaging techniques equipped with this technology can spatially map wound surfaces and reveal dynamic changes in wounds as they age or progress through different healing processes, with specific metabolite and protein accumulations potentially aiding in prognostication.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.