Observational studyCancer science2025
Detection of KRAS Mutations Using Extracellular Vesicle DNA in Colorectal Cancer Patients.
Observational study in Cancer science, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed.
- Utility of Urinary Extracellular Vesicles for Colorectal Cancer: Comparison of DNA Quality and MRD Detection.Cancer science · 2026Article
- Screening, Prognostic, and Predictive Molecular Tools for Colorectal Cancer: Recent Advances in the Classical Background.International journal of molecular sciences · 2026Review
- Emerging role of low-frequency somatic mutations in cancer relapse: from early detection to precision oncology.Frontiers in oncology · 2026Review
- Non-invasive colorectal cancer screening methods: focusing on diagnostic genetic and epigenetic markers.Cancer cell international · 2025Review
- Exploring research frontiers and emerging trends of tyrosine kinase inhibitors in the treatment of colorectal cancer.BMC cancer · 2025Article
- Evaluating cell-free DNA integrity index as a non-invasive biomarker for neoadjuvant chemotherapy in colorectal cancer patients.BMC cancer · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
16 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Liquid biopsy using circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) is useful for precision medicine and molecular-guided oncology; however, its sensitivity is insufficient. We focused on DNA in extracellular vesicles (evDNA) as a new target for liquid biopsy and investigated its sensitivity. This observational study included 334 Stage I-IV colorectal cancer patients. evDNAs and ctDNAs were extracted from plasma collected before surgery. KRAS mutation status was analyzed using droplet digital PCR. One hundred and forty-eight patients had KRAS mutations in tumor tissues, and 186 patients had no KRAS mutations. In Stage II (Stage II 37.8% vs. 13.3%, p = 0.015) or III (Stage III 43.1% vs. 13.6%, p = 0.001) patients, sensitivities to detect KRAS mutations using evDNA were higher than those using ctDNA. Surprisingly, evDNA identified KRAS mutations in 13.8% of patients who lacked them in tumor tissue samples. Among Stage III patients, those with higher concentrations of evDNA had significantly poorer relapse-free survival compared with those who had lower concentrations of evDNA (p = 0.043). The use of evDNA improved the identification rate of KRAS mutations. By using evDNA, KRAS mutations were identified in more than 10% of patients without KRAS mutations in their tumor tissues. The concentration of evDNA can be a prognostic factor for Stage III colorectal cancer patients.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.